V. Strakhova
To Win
M. Bayerlova
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L L W WForm
L W L W L L W L W LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Bayerlova winning 3 and Stamatova winning 2. The last match between Bayerlova and Stamatova was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Julia Stamatova getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2.
W15 Sharm ElSheikh(19-02-2025)
- / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Stamatova
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
11
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
7-5 4-2 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Julia Stamatova
86%
(
56 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Bayerlova has demonstrated a commendable second serve performance, winning 41.39% of points, whereas Stamatova has secured a slightly lower percentage of 36.99%. It is worth noting the strong correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Recent Return Game Statistics: Analyzing return game stats from the recent period, Bayerlova has impressively won 53.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stamatova has achieved a respectable rate of 60.22%. For first serve returns, Bayerlova has obtained 42.32%, and Stamatova has secured 38.14%. These statistics bear a significant correlation to determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
Composure Under Pressure: When it comes to saving breakpoints, Bayerlova has showcased exceptional skills, successfully saving 53.85% of them in recent matches. In contrast, Stamatova has managed to save 43.82%. This statistic holds valuable relevance in predicting in-game betting scenarios.
Performance Overview: Assessing their performance over the past year, Bayerlova has achieved a favorable record, winning 52.17% of their matches (36 wins and 33 losses). On the other hand, Stamatova has secured a win rate of 42.86% (24 wins and 32 losses). These figures provide us with a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Surface Specialization: Examining their career surface win percentages, Bayerlova has excelled on clay courts, winning 60% of their matches (145 wins and 96 losses), while their performance on indoor hard courts has been comparatively weaker, with a win rate of 45% (13 wins and 16 losses). Stamatova, on the other hand, has thrived on hard courts, achieving a win rate of 54% (145 wins and 123 losses), but has struggled on grass courts, failing to secure a single victory (0 wins and 1 loss).
Player Level: In the previous year, Bayerlova predominantly competed in the Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Impressively, they won 48.98% of their matches (24 wins and 25 losses). Conversely, Stamatova primarily participated in the Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with prize money totaling $10,000. In this category, they secured a win rate of 41.46% (17 wins and 24 losses). When evaluating player statistics to determine the favorite, it is crucial to consider the level at which they have been competing.
Head-to-Head Encounters: Bayerlova and Stamatova have clashed once before, resulting in Bayerlova's victory. Stamatova, unfortunately, has not emerged triumphant in any of their encounters. Across these matches, Bayerlova has won both sets played, with their most recent meeting taking place at the W75 Pazardzhik tournament on September 16, 2024, on a clay court. Michaela Bayerlova secured a well-deserved victory with a score of 7-5, 4-2, as her opponent retired.
Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Previous head-to-head matches between these players have lasted an average of 1 hour, 37 minutes, and 0 seconds.
Predicting Deciding Set Outcomes: During their previous encounters, Bayerlova and Stamatova have not reached a deciding set. Bayerlova has notched victories in such situations, whereas Stamatova is yet to achieve the same feat. This information proves invaluable when predicting the outcome of the match if it were to extend to a deciding set.
Pressure Situations in Head-to-Head Matches: To date, Bayerlova and Stamatova have not played any tiebreaks against each other, resulting in a tie in this particular statistical category.
Opponent Quality Analysis: Over the previous 12 months, Bayerlova has faced opponents with an average ranking of 414.87, whereas Stamatova has competed against players with an average ranking of 333.54.
Deciding Set Performance versus All Players: In matches that extend to a deciding set, Bayerlova has displayed exceptional skills, securing victory in 57% of cases over the past 12 months. Stamatova, meanwhile, has achieved success in 44% of the deciding sets played throughout their career on the professional tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance offers valuable insights into predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event stats to determine which player is in better form. For an indication of the players' current performance, please refer to the section below, provided they have participated in a match during the ongoing event. Furthermore, certain players may perform exceptionally well in specific events, and this factor must be considered when making predictions.
Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Bayerlova has impressively converted 48.54% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Stamatova has achieved a success rate of 46.34% when attempting to break their opponent's serve. This statistic becomes highly informative for live in-game betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that offer predictions for tennis matches, the following article provides an excellent starting point (Note: Recommended for statistics enthusiasts only).
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
55
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Laura Badia
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
16 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
33
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clarissa Gai
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
90)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mana Kawamura
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve %
59%
(
13 of
22)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
27
Total Points Won
18
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Stamatova
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
11
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Ana Grubor
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Ana Candiotto
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Unknown Player
Player
Julia Stamatova
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Stamatova
Player
Fiona Ganz
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Iva Ivanova
Player
Julia Stamatova
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Stamatova
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
11
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Michelle Dzjachangirova
Player
Julia Stamatova
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kateryna Lazarenko
Player
Julia Stamatova
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arina Bulatova
Player
Julia Stamatova
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Bayerlova