Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Venus vs Divij Sharan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Venus vs Sharan analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Venus vs Divij Sharan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Venus has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sharan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Venus, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sharan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Venus has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sharan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Venus has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sharan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Venus has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 3/ 12). Sharan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 19/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 22% (W/L 2/ 7).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Venus winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Venus winning 2 and Sharan winning 1. The last match between Venus and Sharan was at the Claro Open Colombia - Bogota, 13-07-2014, Q2 round, Hard with Michael Venus getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Venus and Sharan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Venus winning 1 times and Sharan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Venus winning 0, and Sharan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Venus has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sharan has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Venus has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sharan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Venus has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sharan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Venus 1 - 0 Sharan
Ret.
Rank
274
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
892
Rank
438
High
38
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
53% (211-187)
Career Total W/L
42% (124-170)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$31,030
Career Prize Money
$1,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Venus | Divij Sharan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 23 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:18 | 2:2:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (48/91) | 58% (59/102) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (40/48) | 75% (44/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (25/43) | 49% (21/43) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (37/102) | 29% (26/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Michael Venus
Player
Divij Sharan
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
23
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Venus | Divij Sharan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michael Venus Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Michael Venus
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6 5-7 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Michael Venus
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
15
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-5 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Ze Zhang
Player
Michael Venus
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
8
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Michael Venus
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zihao Xia
Player
Michael Venus
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
9
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
12
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
41 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 |
Stats
Michael Venus
Player
Seong Chan Hong
61%
(
86 of
142)
1st Serve %
58%
(
83 of
142)
17
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
3
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
55%
(
31 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
50 of
142)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
55 of
142)
147
Total Points Won
137
|
6-3 3-6 4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Divij Sharan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bogdan Ionut Apostol
Player
Divij Sharan
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Divij Sharan
53%
(
78 of
146)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
7
Aces
15
10
Double Faults
6
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
53%
(
36 of
68)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
40%
(
58 of
146)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
125
Total Points Won
121
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Divij Sharan
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Divij Sharan
Player
Patrick Fitzgerald
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Divij Sharan
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Puskar
Player
Divij Sharan
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Divij Sharan
Player
Mustafa Erdogan
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
14
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Divij Sharan
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
11
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
8
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Divij Sharan
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bradley Mousley
Player
Divij Sharan
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Venus Vs Sharan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
