search

Michael Mmoh vs Roberto Cid Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mmoh vs Cid analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Michael Mmoh vs Roberto Cid Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mmoh has won 47.19% of points on his second serve, while Cid has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mmoh, in recent form, has won 48.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cid has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.49% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Mmoh has saved 62.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cid has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Mmoh has won 54.39% of matches played (W/L 31/ 26), with Cid winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14). Cid has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
  • Player level: In the last year, Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11), where as Cid has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mmoh has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.46 while Cid has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mmoh has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cid has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Mmoh has converted 41.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cid has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Mmoh 0 - 0 Cid

Michael Mmoh

11

Total

0

Mast

7

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

111

Rank

81

High

26

Age

R

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

30

Age

Plays

Roberto Cid

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L L L L W W L L

Form

58% (286-206)

Career Total W/L

0% (0-0)

42% (8-11)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$1,164,400

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Mmoh VS Cid H2h Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Michael Mmoh Roberto Cid
YTD W/L 42% (8/11) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 46% (19/22) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 50% (194/197) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 30% (3/7) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 67% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 50% (3/3) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.55 0
Aces Total 105 0
DFs per game 0.31 0
DFs Total 58 0
Avg Match Time 1:44:8 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 181.84 0
1st Serve % 65% (809/1247) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 72% (580/809) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 46% (203/438) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 45% (43/96) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 36% (438/1207) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/1) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/2) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 64% (7/4) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 20% (1/4) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 41% (7/17) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 25% (2/8) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 20% (1/5) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 73% (11/8) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 27% (11/3) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (8/0) 0% (0/0)

Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72% ( 62 of 86)
1st Serve %
54% ( 44 of 82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60% ( 37 of 62)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 27 of 44)
54% ( 13 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 18 of 38)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
25% ( 3 of 12)
42% ( 36 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 37 of 82)
87
Total Points Won
81
L
6-3 7-6(6) H2H
QF
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68% ( 17 of 25)
1st Serve %
63% ( 19 of 30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94% ( 16 of 17)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 12 of 19)
63% ( 5 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
73% ( 8 of 11)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
16% ( 4 of 25)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 10 of 30)
31
Total Points Won
24
L
6-3 0-1 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71% ( 39 of 55)
1st Serve %
48% ( 31 of 65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82% ( 32 of 39)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 22 of 31)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 16 of 34)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 13 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 27 of 65)
69
Total Points Won
51
W
6-2 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71% ( 52 of 73)
1st Serve %
58% ( 42 of 72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73% ( 38 of 52)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 26 of 42)
43% ( 9 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
36% ( 26 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 72)
80
Total Points Won
65
W
6-2 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69% ( 55 of 80)
1st Serve %
55% ( 57 of 104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76% ( 42 of 55)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 42 of 57)
60% ( 15 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 23 of 47)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
29% ( 23 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 39 of 104)
96
Total Points Won
88
L
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64% ( 44 of 69)
1st Serve %
65% ( 47 of 72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73% ( 32 of 44)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 31 of 47)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 8 of 25)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
35% ( 24 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 72)
78
Total Points Won
63
L
7-6(4) 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60% ( 62 of 103)
1st Serve %
57% ( 62 of 109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69% ( 43 of 62)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 43 of 62)
44% ( 18 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 19 of 47)
29% ( 4 of 14)
Break Points Won
31% ( 4 of 13)
41% ( 42 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 47 of 109)
108
Total Points Won
104
L
3-6 6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54% ( 29 of 54)
1st Serve %
58% ( 31 of 53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86% ( 25 of 29)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 22 of 31)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 6 of 22)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 5)
30% ( 16 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 25 of 53)
63
Total Points Won
44
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68% ( 38 of 56)
1st Serve %
69% ( 50 of 72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74% ( 28 of 38)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 27 of 50)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 8 of 22)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 19 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 37 of 72)
74
Total Points Won
54
W
6-2 1-6 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Michael Mmoh
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
89% ( 8 of 9)
1st Serve %
39% ( 7 of 18)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88% ( 7 of 8)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
100% ( 1 of 1)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
11% ( 1 of 9)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 11 of 18)
19
Total Points Won
8
W
4-1 ret. H2H

Roberto Cid Recent Matches Played

No Past Matches Available

Mmoh Vs Cid Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions