Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Lammer vs Pavel Snobel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lammer vs Snobel analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Lammer vs Pavel Snobel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lammer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Snobel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lammer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Snobel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lammer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Snobel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lammer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Snobel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lammer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 83/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Snobel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 51/ 34), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Lammer winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Lammer winning 2 and Snobel winning 5. The last match between Lammer and Snobel was at the France F17, 08-10-2007, Semifinals, I.hard with Pavel Snobel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lammer and Snobel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lammer winning 1 times and Snobel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lammer winning 0, and Snobel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lammer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Snobel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lammer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Snobel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lammer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Snobel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lammer 1 - 2 Snobel
Ret.
Rank
150
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
154
High
44
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
55% (399-331)
Career Total W/L
54% (255-214)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$153,020
Career Prize Money
$59,150
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Lammer | Pavel Snobel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 5 |
| Games Won | 30 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (48/90) | 56% (57/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (40/48) | 61% (35/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (23/42) | 41% (18/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (48/101) | 30% (27/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-7(5) 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Michael Lammer
Player
Pavel Snobel
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
111
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Lammer | Pavel Snobel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michael Lammer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Michael Lammer
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Michael Lammer
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Wang
Player
Michael Lammer
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
76)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Fischer
Player
Michael Lammer
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Tom Jomby
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Maxime Teixeira
38%
(
24 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Bruno Volkmann
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 |
Stats
Andreas Seppi
Player
Michael Lammer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Gicquel
Player
Michael Lammer
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Pavel Snobel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Pavel Snobel
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Lammer Vs Snobel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
