N. B. Kjaer
To Win
J. Engel
To Win
Michael Geerts vs Justin Engel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L W W L W
Form
W L L L W L L W W LH2H: Geerts 2 - 0 Engel
They have played 4 sets in total, with Geerts winning 4 and Engel winning 0. The last match between Geerts and Engel was at the Pune Challenger, 17-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Michael Geerts getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Michael Geerts | 2 |
| Justin Engel | 0 |
Pune Challenger(17-02-2025)
7
6
6
2
Upcoming Match
24 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gauff VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Musetti VS Aliassime PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
23 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats 
Michael Geerts
Player
Justin Engel
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Justin Engel
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats
2
H2H Matches
0
4
Sets Won
0
25
Games Won
13
8
Aces (Total)
8
4
Total Double Faults
9
1:22:0
Average Match Time
1:22:0
53% (57/107)
1st Serve %
52% (67/128)
82% (47/57)
1st Serve Win %
72% (48/67)
62% (31/50)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (26/61)
70% (7/10)
Break Points Won % (Total)
25% (1/4)
42% (54/128)
Return Points Win %
27% (29/107)
100% (2/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Michael Geerts vs Justin Engel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michael Geerts 2 - 0 Justin Engel
- Prediction based on second serve performance: In the past six months, Geerts has showcased an impressive record of winning 51.27% of points on their second serve. However, Engel has managed to surpass Geerts' performance, triumphing in 51.45% of their second serve points. It is worth noting that there exists a crucial correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Insights from return game statistics: Analyzing the return game statistics, we find Geerts to be formidable in recent form, having won 51.41% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Engel's performance stands at a commendable 50.19%. A similar trend is observed for first serve returns, with Geerts achieving a proficiency of 30.6% and Engel exhibiting a success rate of 32.27%. This categorical aspect possesses a significant correlation with determining the favorite in this much-anticipated head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evaluating the players' performance under pressure, Geerts has adeptly saved 61.11% of breakpoints in recent matches. In contrast, Engel showcases an even more impressive ability, having successfully saved 64.37% of breakpoints. This incredibly useful statistic holds great importance when making predictions regarding in-game betting scenarios.
- Performance overview: Over the last year, Geerts has been triumphant in 57.14% of matches played, boasting an impressive win-loss record of 48 wins and 36 losses. Meanwhile, Engel has exhibited outstanding dominance, triumphing in 69.7% of matches played, accruing an exceptional win-loss record of 46 victories and only 20 defeats. These numbers provide us with a comprehensive overview when predicting the outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
- Surface expertise: Notably, Geerts has displayed remarkable proficiency on Hard courts, with a career win percentage of 62%. Impressively, this achievement is accompanied by a win-loss record of 174 wins and 105 losses. However, on Grass, Geerts struggles to manifest their prowess, registering a negligible win percentage of 0% with only 2 losses. In contrast, Engel flourishes on Clay courts, exhibiting a notable career win percentage of 60% along with 47 victories and 31 defeats. Interestingly, Engel's weakest surface proves to be I.hard, where they have only managed to secure a 14% win rate with a win-loss record of 1 win and 6 losses.
- Player level: In the previous year, Geerts has primarily competed in the prestigious Challengers/ITF tournaments that boast a prize pool greater than $10K. Within this domain, Geerts has emerged victorious in 49.06% of matches played, accumulating 26 wins and 27 losses. In contrast, Engel has predominantly participated in the equally esteemed Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10K. Remarkably, Engel has displayed exceptional mastery in these events, prevailing in an outstanding 84.78% of matches played, triumphing in 39 instances while succumbing to defeat only 7 times. The relative standing and performance level of the players within their respective event tiers is indeed a key factor to consider when predicting the favored competitor.
- Previous head-to-head matches: Geerts and Engel have had the opportunity to clash on one occasion. Pertinently, Geerts emerged triumphant in that encounter, securing victory once while Engel unfortunately failed to emerge victorious. Throughout the match, a total of two sets were played, both of which were masterfully seized by Geerts, leaving Engel empty-handed. Our most recent encounter between Geerts and Engel transpired at the Heilbronn Challenger on March 6, 2024, during the qualifying round played on Clay. In this captivating display of skill, Michael Geerts triumphed over their opponent with a resounding score of 6-2, 6-3.
- Average match duration in head-to-head matches: Examining the historical head-to-head matches, it is worth noting that the average duration of matches contested between these players stands at an impressive 1 hour, 20 minutes, and 21 seconds.
- Prediction for deciding set: Throughout their confrontations, Geerts and Engel have not yet found themselves engaged in a deciding set. However, should this match venture into such a decisive stage, Geerts has yet to display their prowess in emerging victorious, whereas Engel has yet to falter in their ability to conquer. These insights prove to be invaluable when predicting the outcome of this highly anticipated match if it unfolds in a dramatic manner.
- Head-to-head in extreme pressure situations: Interestingly, Geerts and Engel have never encountered a tiebreak situation in their past battles. Consequently, Geerts has yet to secure a triumph in such high-pressure instances, mirroring Engel's results as well.
- Opponent quality statistics: Reflecting on the past twelve months, Geerts has confronted opponents with an average rank of 399.01, underscoring the impressive level of competition they have encountered. Comparatively, Engel's opponents possess a slightly lower average rank of 346.06. This information provides valuable insight into the caliber of competitors each player has faced.
- Deciding set performance against all players: When considering live predictions and betting propositions, it becomes vital to evaluate the players' ability to perform in deciding sets. Over the previous year, Geerts has been successful in securing victories in 46% of deciding sets, while Engel exhibits an exceptional winning percentage of 70% in all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: Although historical player performance acts as a reliable predictor of tennis matches, once an event commences, assessing the current event-specific statistics becomes imperative. These statistics provide valuable insights into players' current form and performance. For detailed information regarding the current event's statistics, please refer to the event statistics section below (if a match has already been played in the ongoing event). Additionally, it is important to consider the fact that certain players outshine their competitors in specific events, thus impacting the ultimate outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent matches, Geerts has demonstrated a remarkable ability to convert 42.64% of their breakpoint opportunities. In comparison, Engel has exhibited an even higher level of proficiency, converting 48.19% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves to be highly influential when making in-game live betting decisions, particularly when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by in-depth statistical analysis and mathematical models predicting tennis matches, you may find this article to be a valuable resource. Note that it is tailored for individuals with an avid interest in statistical analysis.
Michael Geerts Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(5) 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Michael Geerts
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
James Story
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Guilherme Valdoleiros
92%
(
34 of
37)
1st Serve %
98%
(
49 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Michael Geerts
52%
(
56 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
121)
10
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
53 of
72)
62%
(
32 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
32 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Michael Geerts
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Marek Gengel
58%
(
59 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
14
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Justin Engel
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Justin Engel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Justin Engel
66%
(
75 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
49 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Lucas Bouquet
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Justin Engel
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Justin Engel
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Andre Ilagan
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
11
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(10) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alberto Bronzetti
Player
Justin Engel
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Justin Engel
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
57% (384/292)
Win/Loss
58% (63/46)
56% (867/673)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (138/112)
52% (7574/6905)
Games Win/Loss
52% (1206/1112)
62% (179/109)
Hard Win/Loss
45% (5/6)
53% (129/115)
Clay Win/Loss
60% (49/32)
54% (76/66)
Indoor Hard W/L
53% (9/8)
0% (0/2)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.3
Aces Per Game
0.4
2138
Aces Total
451
0.21
Double Faults Per Game
0.28
1448
Total Double Faults
311
1:22:40
Average Match Time
1:19:36
467.56
Average Opponent Rank
375.19
59% (21740/37104)
1st Serve %
59% (3772/6391)
71% (15371/21740)
1st Serve Win %
69% (2584/3772)
51% (7811/15364)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (1269/2619)
42% (1535/3667)
Break Points Won % (Total)
46% (269/591)
39% (14681/37424)
Return Points Win %
40% (2397/5985)
33% (1/2)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (1/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/9)
Main Tour W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
49% (124/129)
Challenger W/L
32% (8/17)
63% (258/150)
Futures W/L
66% (54/28)
57% (378/664)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (63/109)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (104/208)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (14/27)
47% (94/198)
Deciding Set Win %
63% (20/32)
86% (396/340)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (60/53)
14% (396/56)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (60/7)
16% (280/44)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (49/10)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Michael Geerts
View full predicted draw for Geerts
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Justin Engel
View full predicted draw for Engel
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
