Michael Geerts vs Jip Van Assendelft Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Geerts has been more effective on their second serve, winning 47.12% of points compared to Assendelft's 43.66% over the last 6 months.
• In return games, Assendelft stands out, winning 48.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Geerts manages 44.88%.
• First serve returns show Assendelft with 37.93% success, significantly higher than Geerts' 26.44%.
• Under pressure, Assendelft excels, saving 60% of breakpoints, whereas Geerts saves 51.79%.
• How do their overall performances compare? Geerts has won 59.04% of their matches in the past year, while Assendelft boasts a 75% win rate.
• Geerts' strongest performances are on Hard courts (62% win rate), whereas Assendelft shines on Clay with a 55% win rate.
• In terms of competition level, Geerts has been facing challenging opponents with an average rank of 366.84, while Assendelft played against higher-ranked opponents at 217.25 on average.
• In deciding sets, Assendelft is more reliable, winning 67% compared to Geerts' 52%.
• Geerts has been less effective in converting breakpoints, with only a 29.9% success rate, in contrast to Assendelft's 50% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):

In examining the players' recent form and statistical performance, certain patterns emerge that could serve as key indicators for the upcoming match between Geerts and Assendelft.

Geerts demonstrates slight superiority in second serve performance, which can be a decisive element in tightly contested matches. However, Assendelft compensates with their impressive efficiency in return games, particularly against first serves, where they outperform Geerts significantly.

When evaluating both players under pressure, Assendelft again shows a higher capability by saving a larger percentage of breakpoints. Furthermore, Assendelft's success in converting breakpoints offers them additional leverage during critical moments of the match.

Assendelft's overall match record and performance against stronger-ranked opponents provide an edge in experience and confidence heading into this matchup. Although Geerts has a consistent record on hard courts, the clay-court prowess of Assendelft could be pivotal if surface conditions come into play.

Considering these factors, Assendelft appears to have a slight advantage and is likely to come out as the winner in this match.