Micah Braswell vs Maks Kasnikowski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L L W W
Form
L W W W L W L L W LH2H: Braswell 0 - 0 Kasnikowski
69% (9-4)
YTD Win/Loss
56% (5-4)
0
Head-to-Head
0
428
Ranking
224
420
Highest Rank
168
23
Age
21
-
Plays
-
2
Titles
6
61% (54-35)
Career Total W/L
62% (141-88)
$0
Career Prize Money
$175,105
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zverev VS Thompson PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Braswell VS Kasnikowski H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Micah Braswell vs Maks Kasnikowski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Micah Braswell 0 - 0 Maks Kasnikowski
Insights into the Upcoming Tennis Match:
- When examining recent form, Braswell has displayed a second serve performance of considerable merit, winning an impressive 52.16% of points. In contrast, Kasnikowski has demonstrated a slightly superior performance, triumphing in 53.99% of points. It is worth noting the substantial correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- An analysis of return game statistics in recent form reveals that Braswell has achieved victory in 51.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kasnikowski has achieved an equal success rate of 51.39%. However, when considering first serve returns, Braswell has a success rate of 30.43% compared to Kasnikowski's 27.35%. This information serves as a pivotal factor in identifying the favored contender in this particular head-to-head matchup.
- Under the intense pressure of the game, Braswell has exhibited exceptional composure by saving an impressive 63.78% of breakpoints in recent form. Conversely, Kasnikowski has managed to save 52.34% of breakpoints, which serves as a vital statistic for making accurate in-game betting predictions.
- An overall analysis of performance over the past year indicates Braswell's dominance, with a remarkable 67.86% of matches won (38 victories and 18 losses). In contrast, Kasnikowski has achieved a respectable 55.93% win rate (33 victories and 26 losses). These statistics provide us with a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
- Examining the best surface for each player, Braswell has obtained their highest career surface win percentage on hard courts, triumphing in 68% of matches played (23 victories and 11 losses). Conversely, Braswell's worst surface is clay, with a win percentage of 0% (no victories and 5 losses). Kasnikowski, on the other hand, excels on hard courts, claiming victory in 64% of matches played (27 victories and 15 losses), while struggling on clay with a win percentage of 61% (68 victories and 44 losses).
- When considering the level at which each player competes, it is evident that Braswell primarily participates in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10K. Remarkably, Braswell has emerged victorious in 60.61% of matches played in this category (20 victories and 13 losses). Equally impressive, Kasnikowski has also dominated in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a success rate of 51.16% (22 victories and 21 losses). It is crucial to keep in mind that the prediction of a favorite player is relative to the level of the event in which they have been competing.
- Over the past 12 months, Braswell has encountered opponents with an average rank of 384.55, showcasing their ability to contend against a challenging field. In comparison, Kasnikowski has faced players with an average rank of 281.78, indicating a marginally higher level of competition.
- In the context of deciding sets, Braswell has displayed commendable efficacy by emerging victorious in 59% of such sets played over the past year. Kasnikowski, meanwhile, has achieved a notable success rate of 52% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics are enlightening for those interested in live predictions and betting.
- While historical player performance proves valuable in predicting tennis matches, considering current event statistics is equally essential for evaluating the form and momentum of players. Therefore, it is prudent to examine the section below for up-to-date information pertaining to player performance within the ongoing event. Additionally, the influence of specific events on a player's performance cannot be discounted when determining the final outcome.
- An evaluation of break point conversion rates indicates that Braswell has capitalized on 38.17% of breakpoint opportunities, while Kasnikowski has successfully converted 37.61% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic warrants close consideration for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
- For those intrigued by models designed to predict tennis matches, the following article offers a promising starting point. However, it is advised that only the most devoted of statistical enthusiasts proceed to explore its contents.
Micah Braswell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Micah Braswell
Player
Daniel Cukierman
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Patrick Brady
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Micah Braswell
52%
(
50 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
58 of
114)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
7
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Micah Braswell
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
George Loffhagen
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
14
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Ben Jones
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
7
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Liam Broady
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
15
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
53 of
65)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Micah Braswell
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
62 of
90)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Dan Added
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Louis Dussin
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maks Kasnikowski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Curras Abasolo
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
87%
(
52 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Ryotaro Taguchi
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
53%
(
69 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
18
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
49%
(
30 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
41%
(
53 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
131
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Vilius Gaubas
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
112)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
56 of
77)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
24 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(7) 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Matteo Martineau
50%
(
61 of
122)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
116)
5
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
56 of
77)
66%
(
40 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
38 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
39 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Hayden Jones
64%
(
79 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
124)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
63 of
79)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
58 of
82)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
36 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
40 of
124)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (54/35)
Win/Loss
62% (141/88)
58% (119/87)
Sets Win/Loss
60% (323/217)
52% (1041/957)
Games Win/Loss
53% (2821/2464)
62% (31/19)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (46/28)
0% (0/5)
Clay Win/Loss
61% (68/44)
68% (23/11)
Indoor Hard W/L
63% (27/16)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.3
Aces Per Game
0.3
287
Aces Total
788
0.23
Double Faults Per Game
0.19
228
Total Double Faults
494
1:35:27
Average Match Time
1:50:34
416.96
Average Opponent Rank
437.95
58% (3249/5574)
1st Serve %
58% (9444/16208)
68% (2208/3249)
1st Serve Win %
71% (6684/9444)
50% (1173/2325)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (3449/6764)
43% (240/556)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (739/1699)
40% (2194/5454)
Return Points Win %
41% (6856/16724)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
67% (4/2)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
60% (3/2)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
59% (20/14)
Challenger W/L
55% (66/55)
62% (34/21)
Futures W/L
71% (67/27)
60% (52/86)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
62% (138/224)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
52% (14/27)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (48/92)
59% (17/29)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (40/82)
87% (52/45)
1st Set Won, Won Match
82% (144/118)
13% (52/7)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
18% (144/26)
24% (37/9)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
27% (85/23)
See recent tennis photos of Braswell and Kasnikowski
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
