Mia Pohankova vs Katerina Siniakova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W W L L
Form
W W W L W W W L W LHead To Head: Pohankova 0 - 1 Siniakova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pohankova winning 0 and Siniakova winning 2. The last match between Pohankova and Siniakova was at the Berlin Ladies Open - Berlin, 14-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Katerina Siniakova getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mia Pohankova | 0 |
| Katerina Siniakova | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Berlin Ladies Open - Berlin(14-06-2025)
Katerina Siniakova
Mia Pohankova
7
6
6
1
| Pohankova | Stats | Siniakova |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (4-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (20-16) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 465 | Ranking | 81 |
| 463 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 16 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 14 |
| 75% (18-6) | Career Total W/L | 58% (390-282) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $4,137,015 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Timofeeva VS Kulambayeva PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
14 Jul 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kopriva VS Dellien PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
13 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats 
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Mia Pohankova
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:44:55 | Average Match Time | 1:44:55 |
| 54% (44/81) | 1st Serve % | 63% (45/72) |
| 70% (31/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (33/45) |
| 41% (15/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (17/27) |
| 0% (0/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 31% (22/72) | Return Points Win % | 43% (35/81) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pohankova vs Siniakova Match Preview :
- How do both players perform on their second serve? While Pohankova wins 40.99% of second serve points in recent matches, Siniakova trails at 37.03%. This could provide Pohankova with a slight advantage.
- When it comes to returning serves, Siniakova excels with a 50.68% win rate on opponents' second serves, while Pohankova's rate is 43.65%. On first serve returns, Siniakova also leads slightly with 34.19% compared to Pohankova's 32.95%.
- In high-pressure situations, such as saving breakpoints, Siniakova has a higher success rate, saving 53.18%, compared to Pohankova's 47.17%.
- Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Pohankova has a superior win rate at 78.95% compared to Siniakova's 54.55%. However, Siniakova plays more often on the Main tour while Pohankova has mainly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments.
- What is each player's best surface? Siniakova shines on Clay with a 62% win rate, whereas Pohankova thrives on Indoor Hard courts with a 78% success rate.
- The quality of opponents faced is telling; Siniakova has competed against average-ranked opponents of 105.13, while Pohankova's opponents have averaged a rank of 325.84.
- In deciding sets, Pohankova shows exceptional composure, winning 100% of her deciding sets, whereas Siniakova has won 48% over the past year.
- Which player excels at converting breakpoints? Siniakova converts 40.7% of her breakpoints, slightly outperforming Pohankova, who converts 36%.
Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):
As we look forward to this matchup, both players bring unique advantages to the court. Pohankova displays strong second serve performance while also maintaining an impressive unbeaten record in deciding sets.
However, Siniakova holds her own with superior return stats, effective breakpoint conversion, and experience against higher-ranked opponents.
Although Pohankova's recent win rate is stronger, the quality of competition Siniakova regularly faces could make the difference. In this context, Siniakova seems slightly more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Pohankova vs Siniakova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mia Pohankova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Mia Pohankova
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Katerina Siniakova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Katerina Siniakova
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Qinwen Zheng
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
6
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Katerina Siniakova
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Veronika Kudermetova
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Harmony Tan
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Katerina Siniakova
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75% (18/6) | Win/Loss | 58% (390/282) |
| 66% (37/19) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (890/688) |
| 55% (288/236) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7640/6904) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (162/137) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (130/80) |
| 78% (18/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (60/37) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (38/28) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 83 | Aces Total | 1301 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 64 | Total Double Faults | 2563 |
| 1:40:51 | Average Match Time | 1:28:35 |
| 339.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 356.49 |
| 60% (1040/1729) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25880/41968) |
| 67% (698/1040) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (16266/25880) |
| 49% (336/689) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (7181/16089) |
| 49% (95/193) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2506/5326) |
| 44% (756/1727) | Return Points Win % | 45% (19183/42240) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 45% (38/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 46% (63/73) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (184/130) |
| 80% (16/4) | Challenger W/L | 77% (87/26) |
| 67% (2/1) | Futures W/L | 76% (13/4) |
| 75% (18/24) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (386/662) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (84/143) |
| 88% (7/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (129/240) |
| 94% (16/15) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (382/328) |
| 6% (16/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (382/54) |
| 38% (8/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (289/63) |
Pohankova vs. Siniakova Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
