Mia Mack vs Iman Khan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mack vs Khan analysis and find out who is favored!
Mia Mack vs Iman Khan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mack has won 36.36% of points on his second serve, while Khan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mack, in recent form, has won 55.06% of his opponent's second serve points, while Khan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.64% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mack has saved 56.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Khan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mack has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 6/ 3), with Khan winning 57.14% (W/L 4/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mack has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 27/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 13/ 18). Khan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Mack has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 4/ 1), where as Khan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 3/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mack winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mack winning 2 and Khan winning 0. The last match between Mack and Khan was at the W15 Antalya, 06-06-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Mia Mack getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mack and Khan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mack winning 0 times and Khan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mack winning 0, and Khan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mack has played against opponents with an average rank of 226 while Khan has played against players with an average rank of 75.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mack has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Khan has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mack has converted 51.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Khan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mack 1 - 0 Khan
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
896
Rank
844
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (43-35)
Career Total W/L
39% (14-22)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mia Mack | Iman Khan |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mia Mack | Iman Khan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mia Mack Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Lara Salden
Player
Mia Mack
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Mia Mack
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
87%
(
52 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mia Mack
Player
Luisa Meyer Auf Der Heide
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mia Mack
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Mia Mack
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mia Mack
Player
Yidi Yang
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
54%
(
35 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mia Mack
Player
Zixuan Zeng
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H |
view more
Iman Khan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Lavinia Morreale
Player
Iman Khan
54%
(
13 of
24)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
28
Total Points Won
18
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Iman Khan
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Iman Khan
Player
Maria Oliver Sanchez
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
QF |
Iman Khan
Player
Rinko Matsuda
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 0-6 12-10 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Vlada Mincheva
Player
Iman Khan
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more