Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Merel Hoedt vs Stacey Fung Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoedt vs Fung analysis and find out who is favored!
Merel Hoedt vs Stacey Fung Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoedt has won 43.42% of points on his second serve, while Fung has won 45.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoedt, in recent form, has won 56.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fung has won 54.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.14% and 39.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoedt has saved 52.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fung has saved 52.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoedt has won 59.38% of matches played (W/L 38/ 26), with Fung winning 55.77% (W/L 29/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 101/ 78), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fung has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 27/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17), where as Fung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.18% of matches (W/L 29/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hoedt winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 2 and Fung winning 2. The last match between Hoedt and Fung was at the W15 Monastir, 30-03-2021, Q3, Hard with Merel Hoedt getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:42:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoedt and Fung have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hoedt winning 0 times and Fung 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoedt winning 0, and Fung 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.91 while Fung has played against players with an average rank of 253.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoedt has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fung has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoedt has converted 50.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fung has converted 46.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 1 Fung
540
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
262
Rank
222
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
55% (158-130)
Career Total W/L
64% (142-81)
57% (12-9)
YTD W/L
47% (8-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Stacey Fung |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 15 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:42:30 | 0:42:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (32/52) | 74% (34/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (17/32) | 76% (26/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (8/20) | 67% (8/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 26% (12/46) | 52% (27/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Stacey Fung
Player
Merel Hoedt
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Stacey Fung |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | 47% (8/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (28/19) | 50% (20/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (238/201) | 50% (191/188) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 43% (6/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.62 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 132 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:2 | 1:57:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.14 | 354.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (920/1376) | 63% (760/1207) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (570/920) | 61% (466/760) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (194/456) | 43% (192/447) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (101/203) | 51% (76/150) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (712/1491) | 46% (554/1194) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (7/5) | 53% (8/7) |
| Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 47% (8/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (7/0) |
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Merel Hoedt
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Alexandra Vasilyeva
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enola Chiesa
Player
Merel Hoedt
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
53%
(
35 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Margot Phanthala
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carmen Lopez Martinez
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
13
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stacey Fung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Destanee Aiava
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Hanna Chang
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Momoko Kobori
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Stacey Fung
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Stacey Fung
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Stacey Fung
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Rodriguez
Player
Stacey Fung
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
39 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Jessie Aney
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hoedt Vs Fung Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
