Merel Hoedt vs Sada Nahimana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoedt vs Nahimana analysis and find out who is favored!
Merel Hoedt vs Sada Nahimana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoedt has won 43.42% of points on his second serve, while Nahimana has won 44.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoedt, in recent form, has won 56.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nahimana has won 57.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.14% and 40.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoedt has saved 52.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nahimana has saved 52.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoedt has won 59.38% of matches played (W/L 38/ 26), with Nahimana winning 50% (W/L 32/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 101/ 78), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nahimana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 40/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 8/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17), where as Nahimana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.85% of matches (W/L 30/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoedt winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 0 and Nahimana winning 2. The last match between Hoedt and Nahimana was at the W25 Koksijde, 13-08-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Sada Nahimana getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoedt and Nahimana have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hoedt winning 0 times and Nahimana 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hoedt winning 0, and Nahimana 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.91 while Nahimana has played against players with an average rank of 281.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoedt has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nahimana has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoedt has converted 50.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nahimana has converted 51.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hoedt 0 - 1 Nahimana
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
540
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
383
Rank
244
High
22
Age
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
55% (158-130)
Career Total W/L
60% (156-106)
57% (12-9)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Merel Hoedt | Sada Nahimana |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 9 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 9 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (53/78) | 69% (47/68) |
1st Serve Win% | 57% (30/53) | 55% (26/47) |
2nd Serve Win% | 32% (8/25) | 62% (13/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 43% (29/68) | 51% (40/78) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(5) |
Sada Nahimana
Player
Merel Hoedt
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Merel Hoedt | Sada Nahimana |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | 53% (9/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (28/19) | 53% (20/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (238/201) | 52% (169/157) |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 67% (2/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 60% (6/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 25% (1/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.17 |
Aces Total | 26 | 27 |
DFs per game | 0.62 | 0.37 |
DFs Total | 132 | 59 |
Avg Match Time | 1:54:2 | 1:36:24 |
Avg Opp Rank | 247.14 | 222.82 |
1st Serve % | 67% (920/1376) | 69% (770/1122) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (570/920) | 59% (452/770) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (194/456) | 43% (150/352) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (101/203) | 55% (72/130) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (712/1491) | 46% (486/1051) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 58% (7/5) | 50% (7/7) |
Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 67% (2/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 53% (9/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 50% (2/4) |
1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 82% (11/9) |
1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 18% (11/2) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (6/0) |
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alice Robbe
Player
Merel Hoedt
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Alexandra Vasilyeva
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Enola Chiesa
Player
Merel Hoedt
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
53%
(
35 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Merel Hoedt
Player
Margot Phanthala
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carmen Lopez Martinez
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
13
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Sada Nahimana
Player
Diana Martynov
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sada Nahimana
Player
Elena Milovanovic
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Sada Nahimana
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sada Nahimana
Player
Julia Peer
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lian Tran
Player
Sada Nahimana
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mara Guth
Player
Sada Nahimana
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sada Nahimana
Player
Aya El Aouni
86%
(
50 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sada Nahimana
Player
Gina Feistel
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
42 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more