Prediction of Merel Hoedt [703rd] vs Friederike Nolte [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W L L W L
Form
W L L L W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Nolte
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 2 and Nolte winning 0. The last match between Hoedt and Nolte was at the W15 Gonesse, 12-03-2025, First, Clay with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Merel Hoedt | 1 |
| Friederike Nolte | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Merel Hoedt
Player
Friederike Nolte
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:6:16 | Average Match Time | 2:6:16 |
| 78% (51/65) | 1st Serve % | 72% (59/82) |
| 63% (32/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (28/59) |
| 29% (4/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 47% (7/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 71% (5/7) |
| 54% (44/82) | Return Points Win % | 45% (29/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Merel Hoedt vs Friederike Nolte Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Nolte
Editorial Prediction:
In recent form over the last six months, player performance can be analyzed through several key statistics to predict their likelihood of success in an upcoming match. One significant area is the second serve performance, where Hoedt has managed to secure 38.52% of points, compared to Nolte’s 40.42%. This metric holds a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy, providing insight into potential match outcomes.
The ability to perform under pressure is another critical factor. Hoedt has saved 44.7% of breakpoints faced, while Nolte has saved 39.16%, offering valuable insight for in-game betting predictions when evaluating which player is more likely to withstand stressful moments in a match. When these opportunities arise, the ability to convert them is equally important. Hoedt has converted 37.72% of their break chances, while Nolte boasts a higher conversion rate at 42.98%.
Both players exhibit similar return game capabilities on their opponent’s serve. In recent form, Hoedt has won 55.03% of opponents' second serve points, while Nolte has won 48.15%. Their performance on first serve returns is nearly identical, with Hoedt at 34.33% and Nolte at 34.18%. These stats further inform the head-to-head prediction by indicating which player might dominate the return games.
Surface preference also plays a role in forecasting match outcomes. Both players have their best win percentage on clay courts, with Hoedt and Nolte each winning 56% of their clay surface matches. However, their weakness differs as Hoedt’s worst record is on grass (0%), whereas Nolte struggles on indoor hard courts with a 33% win rate.
In terms of player level, Hoedt and Nolte have competed at different tiers predominantly over the last year. While Hoedt has a win percentage of 51.22% in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, Nolte has played mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches. This discrepancy in competition level can impact the predictive analysis of their head-to-head potential.
Deciding set performance reveals another aspect of each player’s competitive edge. Over the past year, Hoedt has succeeded in 29% of deciding sets, whereas Nolte's win rate stands at 33% in similar scenarios. This suggests a slightly higher resilience from Nolte in extended matches, adding another layer to predicting the likely victor.
Overall, match statistics, including breakpoints, serve returns, surface preferences, and pressure handling, contribute to a projection of each player's potential in the upcoming match. While both players illustrate strengths in different areas, Nolte’s slightly superior statistics in second serve points, break point conversion, and deciding set outcomes suggest that Nolte may be favored to win based on the recent data analysis.
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Merel Hoedt
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Demi Tran
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Merel Hoedt
47%
(
47 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Diaz Adrover
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Friederike Nolte
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Merel Hoedt
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
22 of
33)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Britt Du Pree
Player
Merel Hoedt
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marine Szostak
Player
Merel Hoedt
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
83%
(
53 of
64)
5
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yui Chikaraishi
Player
Merel Hoedt
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
8
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
54%
(
45 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Friederike Nolte Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Friederike Nolte
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Friederike Nolte
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Friederike Nolte
Player
Selya Rakki
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 1-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-3 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (181/157) | Win/Loss | 49% (28/29) |
| 53% (408/355) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (68/63) |
| 52% (3570/3248) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (657/613) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 355 | Aces Total | 48 |
| 0.57 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1876 | Total Double Faults | 90 |
| 1:38:45 | Average Match Time | 1:4:11 |
| 475.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 389.47 |
| 64% (12876/20134) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1327/2226) |
| 60% (7747/12876) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (781/1327) |
| 42% (3025/7258) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (430/899) |
| 50% (1395/2791) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (134/249) |
| 48% (9942/20625) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1010/2199) |
| 53% (175/330) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (26/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 45% (42/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 84% (183/154) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (31/25) |
| 14% (183/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (31/6) |
| 15% (155/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (26/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
