M. Y. Chen
To Win
E. Bektas
To Win
Meng Yi Chen vs Eliessa Vanlangendonck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L L L L
Form
W L L W W L L L L LHead-to-head: Chen 1 - 0 Vanlangendonck
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chen winning 2 and Vanlangendonck winning 0. The last match between Chen and Vanlangendonck was at the W15 Monastir, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Meng Yi Chen getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
W15 Monastir(19-02-2025)
7
5
7
5
40% (6-9)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-2)
1
Head-to-Head
0
791
Ranking
509
734
Highest Rank
440
22
Age
27
-
Plays
-
0
Titles
4
51% (73-71)
Career Total W/L
59% (326-226)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
1
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kvitova VS Kenin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Goffin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Chen VS Vanlangendonck H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 | |||||
Chen VS Vanlangendonck H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
14
Games Won
10
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Meng Yi Chen vs Eliessa Vanlangendonck Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Meng Yi Chen 1 - 0 Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Insights on the Upcoming Tennis Match
In the realm of tennis predictions, various aspects warrant consideration to accurately assess the course of the game. Let us delve into the statistical underpinnings.
Second Serve Performance: Analyzing the recent form, it is observable that Chen has exhibited an impressive 44.63% triumph rate on their second serve, whereas Vanlangendonck has attained a commendable 42.98% rate. It is intriguing to note the significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Stats: Recent return statistics divulge that Chen, in recent form, has astoundingly secured 51.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vanlangendonck has achieved a noteworthy 60.97%. Akin observations can be made regarding first serve returns, where Chen and Vanlangendonck have recorded percentages of 40.61% and 41.32% respectively. Evidently, these figures exhibit a strong correlation with determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: When placed under pressure, Chen has deftly saved 51.13% of breakpoints during their recent performances. Correspondingly, Vanlangendonck has exhibited an admirable 48.11% success rate. Surely, this particular statistic holds exceptional utility in in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Evaluating their performance over the past year, Chen has emerged victorious in 50% of the matches played (W/L: 27/27), while Vanlangendonck has triumphed in a remarkable 66.67% (W/L: 48/24). These numbers provide a comprehensive overview that aids in predicting the forthcoming head-to-head matchup.
Best Surface: Examining career surface win percentages, Chen has excelled on Hard courts, securing an impressive 54% victory rate (W/L: 61/51). Conversely, their performance on I.hard courts has been lackluster, without a single victory (W/L: 0/1). Vanlangendonck's career has seen considerable success on Hard courts, attaining a 62% win rate (W/L: 171/107). Their performance on I.hard courts, although comparatively weaker, is still commendable with a win rate of 56% (W/L: 18/14).
Player Level: In the past year, Chen has predominantly competed in the challenging realm of Challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize money exceeding $10K. This player has achieved a 50% success rate (W/L: 19/19). As for Vanlangendonck, they have primarily participated in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize money of $10K, securing a remarkable 68.97% victory rate (W/L: 40/18). Naturally, when comparing these statistics to predict the favored contender, contextualizing them within the event level is paramount.
Opponent Quality Stats: During the last 12 months, Chen has faced opponents with an average rank of 400.19, while Vanlangendonck's opponents had an average rank of 488.65. These figures provide insight into the level of competition each player has encountered.
Deciding Set Performance vs All Players: For those keen on live predictions and betting, if the match progresses to a deciding set, it is worth noting that Chen has emerged successful in 38% of such sets over the past year. Conversely, Vanlangendonck has emerged victorious in 61% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics offer a glimpse into the players' proficiency in decisive moments, enabling more accurate predictions.
Current Event H2H Stats: While past player performance undoubtedly carries weight in predicting tennis matches, it is also crucial to consider current event statistics to gain insights into players' current form. Consequently, thorough examination of the section below becomes necessary to grasp indications of in-form players. Additionally, some players exhibit superior performance at specific events, a factor worthy of consideration when predicting the outcome.
Break Point Conversion: Assessing recent form, Chen has displayed an impressive 51.57% conversion rate when presented with breakpoint opportunities. In comparison, Vanlangendonck has successfully converted 48.55% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This noteworthy statistic holds valuable implications for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
For those enticed by models predicting tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Stats geeks only).
Meng Yi Chen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Chengyiyi Yuan
Player
Meng Yi Chen
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Na-Ri Kim
Player
Meng Yi Chen
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Morvayova
Player
Meng Yi Chen
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
4-6 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Meng Yi Chen
Player
Paola Lopez
50%
(
6 of
12)
1st Serve %
62%
(
8 of
13)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
12
Total Points Won
13
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Daavettila
Player
Meng Yi Chen
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
79%
(
41 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Polina Kaibekova
Player
Meng Yi Chen
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Eliessa Vanlangendonck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiana Tian Deng
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
12
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alyssa Reguer
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
5
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
6
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
45%
(
24 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hephzibah Oluwadare
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
53%
(
53 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Julia Middendorf
89%
(
64 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Olivia Gram
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deniz Dilek
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Marie Villet
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
51% (73/71)
Win/Loss
59% (326/226)
52% (164/154)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (717/534)
50% (1441/1416)
Games Win/Loss
53% (6005/5275)
54% (62/53)
Hard Win/Loss
61% (171/108)
41% (7/10)
Clay Win/Loss
57% (137/104)
30% (3/7)
Indoor Hard W/L
56% (18/14)
50% (1/1)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.02
Aces Per Game
0.05
27
Aces Total
284
0.25
Double Faults Per Game
0.26
346
Total Double Faults
1447
1:11:55
Average Match Time
1:22:15
124.13
Average Opponent Rank
505.42
68% (4573/6723)
1st Serve %
67% (20079/29812)
54% (2472/4573)
1st Serve Win %
58% (11557/20079)
45% (957/2150)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (4252/9733)
51% (439/863)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (2081/4159)
47% (3207/6808)
Return Points Win %
49% (14497/29792)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
46% (28/33)
Challenger W/L
53% (49/43)
54% (45/38)
Futures W/L
60% (277/183)
51% (72/142)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
59% (319/543)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
83% (15/18)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (50/93)
41% (13/32)
Deciding Set Win %
54% (84/156)
87% (77/67)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (323/278)
12% (77/9)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (323/44)
9% (67/6)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (229/47)
See recent tennis photos of Chen and Vanlangendonck
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Meng Yi Chen
View full predicted draw for Chen
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
