Meiling Wang vs Lama Nabil Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Nabil analysis and find out who is favored!
Meiling Wang vs Lama Nabil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 43.93% of points on his second serve, while Nabil has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 62.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nabil has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.33% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 46.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nabil has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 58.97% of matches played (W/L 23/ 16), with Nabil winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 17/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Nabil has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 12/ 11), where as Nabil has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wang winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wang winning 2 and Nabil winning 0. The last match between Wang and Nabil was at the W15 Cairo, 02-03-2020, Q3, Hard with Meiling Wang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Nabil have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wang winning 0 times and Nabil 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Nabil 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.21 while Nabil has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nabil has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 60.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nabil has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 0 Nabil
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
595
Rank
417
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (123-90)
Career Total W/L
40% (4-6)
71% (5-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$15,980
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Meiling Wang | Lama Nabil |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Meiling Wang | Lama Nabil |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 56% (78/62) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.15 | 0 |
Aces Total | 10 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.47 | 0 |
DFs Total | 32 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:26:51 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 221.57 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (265/447) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (167/265) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (79/182) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 67% (35/52) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 51% (212/413) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Meiling Wang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Meiling Wang
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
52%
(
40 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Meiling Wang
Player
Anastasia Kovaleva
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Xinyu Gao
Player
Meiling Wang
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Meiling Wang
Player
Jiaqi Wang
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
52%
(
42 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Meiling Wang
Player
Arianne Hartono
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Meiling Wang
Player
I-Hsuan Cho
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Meiling Wang
Player
Fang Ying Xun
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Meiling Wang
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Meiling Wang
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
74%
(
86 of
117)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
55 of
86)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
117)
106
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Meiling Wang
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Lama Nabil Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Krystal Blanch
Player
Lama Nabil
43%
(
13 of
30)
1st Serve %
71%
(
20 of
28)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
48
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Vickie Trocker
Player
Lama Nabil
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
84%
(
37 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 10-5 | H2H |
view more