Mayar Sherif vs Priscilla Hon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W W W L
Form
W W W L W L L W L LHead To Head: Sherif 1 - 0 Hon
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sherif winning 2 and Hon winning 0. The last match between Sherif and Hon was at the Parma Ladies Open - Parma, 14-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Mayar Sherif getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mayar Sherif | 1 |
| Priscilla Hon | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Parma Ladies Open - Parma(14-05-2025)
Mayar Sherif
Priscilla Hon
6
3
6
3
| Sherif | Stats | Hon |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (18-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (24-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 88 | Ranking | 137 |
| 31 | Highest Rank | 118 |
| 29 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 20 | Titles | 13 |
| 65% (296-162) | Career Total W/L | 58% (317-227) |
| $1,018,848 | Career Prize Money | $852,702 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kovacevic VS Tomic PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Diallo VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Mayar Sherif
Player
Priscilla Hon
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:35:58 | Average Match Time | 1:35:58 |
| 64% (36/56) | 1st Serve % | 82% (58/71) |
| 67% (24/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (31/58) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (4/13) |
| 33% (5/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 51% (36/71) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sherif vs Hon Match Preview :
- Recent second serve statistics reveal Hon's advantage, winning 43.03% of second serve points compared to Sherif's 38.24%. Could this be an indicator of their overall match performance?
- Regarding return games, Hon secures 51.85% of points on opponents' second serves, slightly better than Sherif's 50.15%. However, Sherif edges ahead in first serve returns, capturing 35% as opposed to Hon's 31.57%.
- In high-pressure situations, both players save approximately 51% of breakpoints, showing similar composure under stress.
- When it comes to performance accomplishments, Hon has a recent match win rate of 62.32%, narrowly surpassing Sherif's 59.02% over the past year.
- Surface preferences favor Hon on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Sherif thrives on clay, boasting a 74% winning percentage.
- Examining event participation, Sherif has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a higher rank of 160.36 compared to Hon's 251.28.
- In deciding sets, Hon shows a strong inclination to win, having a 59% success rate versus Sherif's 39% over the past year, suggesting a potential mental edge if the match goes the distance.
- Break point efficiency favors Hon slightly, converting 37.41% compared to Sherif's 33.05%, which could be crucial during pivotal moments in the match.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
Taking into account the recent performance trends, Hon demonstrates a marginal edge in several crucial areas such as second serve performance, percentage of successful return points on opponents' second serves, and break point conversion. These facets often tilt the balance in closely contested matches.
While both players show resilience under pressure as indicated by nearly identical breakpoint saving capabilities, Hon's aptitude in deciding sets could prove decisive should the encounter extend to such a situation.
Sherif's strength on a clay surface stands out, but considering the surface specifics, Hon's advantageous performance on indoor hard courts might provide them with a slight edge.
Although Sherif has competed against higher-ranked opponents, which could imply an underestimated tenacity, the statistical overview suggests that Hon is more likely to come out on top during this upcoming tennis contest.
Sherif vs Hon Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mayar Sherif Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Sofia Costoulas
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Caroline Werner
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
10 of
17)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
48%
(
20 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Mayar Sherif
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Elena Pridankina
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Priscilla Hon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Priscilla Hon
64%
(
72 of
113)
1st Serve %
65%
(
80 of
123)
2
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
62 of
80)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
123)
121
Total Points Won
115
|
5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Priscilla Hon
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Mika Stojsavljevic
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Priscilla Hon
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Priscilla Hon
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Ella Seidel
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Priscilla Hon
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Katarzyna Kawa
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
30 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
57
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (296/162) | Win/Loss | 58% (317/227) |
| 63% (653/386) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (702/561) |
| 55% (5243/4307) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6165/5580) |
| 48% (72/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (210/138) |
| 74% (221/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (71/59) |
| 25% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (16/10) |
| 29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (20/20) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 806 | Aces Total | 1606 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 561 | Total Double Faults | 1385 |
| 1:28:39 | Average Match Time | 1:20:53 |
| 378.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 473.1 |
| 72% (18550/25808) | 1st Serve % | 60% (19265/31962) |
| 63% (11702/18550) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (12475/19265) |
| 49% (3576/7257) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5898/12697) |
| 45% (1494/3287) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1716/3604) |
| 45% (11815/26296) | Return Points Win % | 44% (13726/31251) |
| 42% (14/19) | Slam W/L | 45% (24/29) |
| 33% (11/22) | Masters W/L | 39% (7/11) |
| 43% (30/39) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (44/46) |
| 78% (158/44) | Challenger W/L | 62% (206/126) |
| 69% (83/38) | Futures W/L | 71% (36/15) |
| 65% (292/451) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (315/540) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 66% (68/103) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (68/138) |
| 50% (64/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (107/175) |
| 88% (300/263) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (300/261) |
| 12% (300/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (300/39) |
| 20% (158/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (244/55) |
Sherif vs. Hon Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
