Maya Joint vs Mirjam Bjorklund Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L W W L
Form
L W L L W L W L L LHead-2-Head: Joint 1 - 0 Bjorklund
They have played 3 sets in total, with Joint winning 2 and Bjorklund winning 1. The last match between Joint and Bjorklund was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 05-03-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Maya Joint getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maya Joint | 1 |
| Mirjam Bjorklund | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(05-03-2025)
6
2
4
6
6
3
| Joint | Stats | Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (25-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 29% (2-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 78 | Ranking | 585 |
| 78 | Highest Rank | 123 |
| 19 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 10 |
| 66% (101-53) | Career Total W/L | 60% (219-147) |
| $265,738 | Career Prize Money | $508,748 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
11 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Jong PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
12 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Maya Joint
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
30%
(
13 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:54:33 | Average Match Time | 1:54:33 |
| 49% (42/86) | 1st Serve % | 62% (54/87) |
| 69% (29/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (26/54) |
| 30% (13/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (10/33) |
| 53% (9/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 70% (7/10) |
| 59% (51/87) | Return Points Win % | 51% (44/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Joint vs Bjorklund Match Preview :
Picture yourself on the tennis court, where the only thing flying higher in the air than second serves are the dreams and sweat of our two competitors: Joint and Bjorklund. The showdown promises enough twists and turns to rival a season finale of your favorite drama! Joint, in recent performances, is serving up 41.99% success on second serves, while Bjorklund follows closely with 40.71%—both numbers just low enough to keep statisticians on the edge of their spreadsheets. The real question on everyone's mind, like who the host of the next awards show will be, is: how does this impact their forecasted win rate? Let's just say it's mildly scandalous.
Return games are where the real plot thickens. Joint seems to have an appetite for snatching points right off his opponent's second serves with a rate of 49.61%, like a kid in a cookie jar, while Bjorklund manages 37.35%, serving more of a "wait-your-turn" attitude. For a spicy addition, when it comes to first serve return stats, Joint is nibbling at 33.58% while Bjorklund hits back with 36.61%. So who's wearing the crown? You'll have to jog on the treadmill of stats to find out!
Speaking of pressure, it's like a high-stakes poker game. Joint isn’t bluffing, saving 47.72% of breakpoints recently, showcasing a steely nerve akin to a Hollywood spy. Bjorklund, with a respectable 42.11%, prefers a more romantic comedy take on such tense moments. When it comes to long-term plots, over the past year, Joint has taken victory laps in 68.75% of his matches, while Bjorklund shines in a respectable 41.18%.
Now, let’s talk about who feels more at home when the ground beneath them is not earth, but clay. Joint loves the clay, boasting 72% wins and Bjorklund trails with love at 65%. But change the terrain to indoor hard courts, and Joint remains flexible with a 62% win rate, while Bjorklund finds themselves grimacing at a 42% turnout.
Joint enjoys playing in the Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, winning an impressive 69.57%, happily reminiscent of a weekend trip to the spa. Meanwhile, Bjorklund hits an even 50%, maintaining a calm cool under the same scenario. When we're talking about opponents faced, Joint's battles are usually against ugliest monsters ranked at an average of 231.82 while Bjorklund faces slightly less harsh dragons with an average rank of 158.59. Expectation-wise, Joint doesn't fold under pressure in the deciding sets, clinching 64%, whereas Bjorklund takes the philosophical route at 50%.
Nonetheless, when breakpoints as sweet as a long-lost cherry pie present themselves, Joint converts them into points 47.73% of the time. Bjorklund follows with a timid but determined 34.62%. So, as you ready your lucky socks for another thrilling match, remember to place your bets wisely. With stats as flavor-packed as these, Conventional Wisdom leans on Joint to take the trophy home, provided Bjorklund doesn't decide to rewrite the script. Enjoy the spectacle, and may the best tennis player win!
Maya Joint Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Maya Joint
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
115)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
46 of
81)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Viktorija Golubic
77%
(
72 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
112)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Maya Joint
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Maya Joint
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
0
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Jil Teichmann
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Sara Errani
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Yuliana Monroy
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
156%
(
39 of
25)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Maya Joint
100%
(
63 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
30%
(
13 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Olivia Gadecki
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Alycia Parks
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
12 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Anastasiia Sobolieva
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (101/53) | Win/Loss | 60% (219/147) |
| 62% (221/138) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (487/341) |
| 55% (1803/1459) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4031/3394) |
| 65% (60/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (59/47) |
| 70% (28/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (128/70) |
| 60% (9/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (23/25) |
| 67% (4/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 171 | Aces Total | 538 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 457 | Total Double Faults | 602 |
| 1:36:39 | Average Match Time | 1:28:13 |
| 268.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 462.46 |
| 65% (6739/10379) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14303/21932) |
| 60% (4068/6739) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (8682/14303) |
| 48% (1754/3639) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3579/7629) |
| 51% (697/1363) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1461/3083) |
| 48% (4899/10169) | Return Points Win % | 47% (10586/22367) |
| 64% (7/4) | Slam W/L | 63% (17/10) |
| 67% (8/4) | Masters W/L | 25% (4/12) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 63% (12/7) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (11/18) |
| 67% (70/35) | Challenger W/L | 62% (107/65) |
| 60% (3/2) | Futures W/L | 66% (78/40) |
| 65% (97/150) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (215/356) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 53% (18/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (34/64) |
| 59% (30/51) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (51/102) |
| 87% (100/87) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (223/195) |
| 13% (100/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (223/27) |
| 26% (54/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (143/23) |
Joint vs. Bjorklund Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
