M. Joint
To Win
R. Masarova
To Win
Maya Joint vs Madison Sieg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W W L W
Form
W L W L W W W L L WHead-to-head: Joint 1 - 0 Sieg
They have played 2 sets in total, with Joint winning 2 and Sieg winning 0. The last match between Joint and Sieg was at the Cancun Tennis Open - Cancun, 13-02-2025, Second, Hard with Maya Joint getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
Cancun Tennis Open - Cancun(13-02-2025)
6
0
6
3
Upcoming Match
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Upcoming Match
- / Second
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Maya Joint
Player
Madison Sieg
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
3
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
2
0:53:18
Average Match Time
0:53:18
74% (32/43)
1st Serve %
60% (24/40)
81% (26/32)
1st Serve Win %
63% (15/24)
73% (8/11)
2nd Serve Win %
25% (4/16)
100% (4/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/1)
53% (21/40)
Return Points Win %
21% (9/43)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maya Joint Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Sara Errani
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
72 of
91)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Maya Joint
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
30%
(
13 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
43 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Maya Joint
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Donna Vekic
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Julia Grabher
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Solana Sierra
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Emina Bektas
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Maya Joint
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Madison Sieg
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mary Stoiana
Player
Madison Sieg
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Alexis Nguyen
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Despina Papamichail
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Maria Kononova
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Madison Sieg
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Madison Sieg
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Gabriela Lee
73%
(
73 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
66% (93/47)
Win/Loss
54% (103/86)
62% (203/122)
Sets Win/Loss
52% (222/206)
56% (1635/1303)
Games Win/Loss
51% (1950/1908)
65% (58/31)
Hard Win/Loss
54% (59/50)
72% (23/9)
Clay Win/Loss
55% (33/27)
62% (8/5)
Indoor Hard W/L
55% (11/9)
67% (4/2)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.11
Aces Per Game
0.12
157
Aces Total
221
0.29
Double Faults Per Game
0.34
412
Total Double Faults
643
1:35:39
Average Match Time
1:41:59
274.98
Average Opponent Rank
431.26
65% (6024/9313)
1st Serve %
63% (7316/11677)
60% (3634/6024)
1st Serve Win %
59% (4330/7316)
49% (1598/3288)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (1965/4361)
51% (632/1229)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (743/1540)
48% (4403/9098)
Return Points Win %
46% (5522/11945)
64% (7/4)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
75% (3/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
63% (12/7)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
67% (68/33)
Challenger W/L
52% (81/74)
60% (3/2)
Futures W/L
69% (22/10)
65% (89/136)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (101/185)
100% (2/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
52% (15/29)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
53% (16/30)
58% (26/45)
Deciding Set Win %
68% (34/50)
87% (92/80)
1st Set Won, Won Match
90% (94/85)
13% (92/12)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
10% (94/9)
27% (48/13)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
19% (95/18)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
