A. Tomljanovic
To Win
M. Joint
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W L W W WForm
W L W L W L W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Joint winning 0 and Navarro winning 2. The last match between Joint and Navarro was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 24-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Emma Navarro getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Maya Joint | 0 |
Emma Navarro | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(24-04-2025)
Joint | Stats | Navarro |
---|---|---|
68% (28-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (17-12) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
78 | Ranking | 9 |
78 | Highest Rank | 8 |
19 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | - |
2 | Titles | 9 |
66% (104-53) | Career Total W/L | 64% (221-125) |
$277,708 | Career Prize Money | $3,890,862 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
25 May 2025 / Semifinals
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Navarro
Player
Maya Joint
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
0
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
10 | Games Won | 14 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:47:31 | Average Match Time | 1:47:31 |
65% (60/93) | 1st Serve % | 49% (35/72) |
63% (38/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (23/35) |
27% (9/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (16/37) |
40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
46% (33/72) | Return Points Win % | 49% (46/93) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In recent months, the effectiveness of players on their second serve has been a focal point for match predictions. Navarro has secured 38.63% of these points, compared to Joint, who has achieved a slightly higher success rate of 41.42%. This metric is notably correlated with the outcomes of matches, providing a reliable guide for forecasting winners.
Examining return game statistics, Navarro has excelled at winning 52.32% of points from their opponent's second serves recently. Conversely, Joint has gained success in 51.9% of similar scenarios. For first serve returns, Navarro has triumphed in 34.75% of points, narrowly edging out Joint, who stands at 34.2%. The analysis of these return statistics carries significant weight in head-to-head match predictions.
Under pressure, when it comes to saving breakpoints, Joint has demonstrated proficiency, successfully fending off 48.1% of breakpoints. Navarro, meanwhile, has a slightly lower efficacy rate of 46.34%, making these statistics valuable for in-game wagering insights.
Overall, within the last year, match statistics reveal that Navarro has a win/loss record of 46 wins to 25 losses, translating to a 64.79% win rate. Joint, however, surpasses this with a 65.93% success rate, having achieved 60 wins compared to 31 losses. Notably, this comparison offers an overarching view of head-to-head predictions.
Analyzing surface-specific success, Navarro has found the most success on indoor hard courts, boasting a career win percentage of 73%. Meanwhile, her performance dips slightly on standard hard courts with a 59% win rate. Joint, on the other hand, thrives on clay, winning 74% of matches, but experiences a decrease on indoor hard courts, maintaining a 60% win percentage.
Navarro and Joint have primarily played on different levels of events over the past year, impacting the relevance of their statistics. Navarro has consistently competed on the main tour, winning 64% of her matches. In contrast, Joint has mostly appeared in Challenger/ITF tournaments, achieving a 65.45% win rate. These nuances in competition levels affect predictions.
The caliber of opponents faced by each player also varies significantly. Over the past 12 months, Navarro has been confronting adversaries with an average ranking of 72.65, while Joint's opponents had an average rank of 225.18, providing further insight into the comparative difficulty of their recent matches.
In situations where a match progresses to a deciding set, Joint emerges slightly ahead, having clinched victory in 63% of deciding sets over the last year. Navarro has found success in 61% of similar scenarios, making this an intriguing point of consideration for live match predictions.
Lastly, focusing on break point conversion, Joint leads by converting 49.54% of her opportunities, whereas Navarro has a conversion rate of 46.07%. This statistic is particularly valuable for live betting scenarios during breakpoint situations.
Analyzing these collective statistics in depth suggests that Joint is more likely to emerge victorious, given her slight advantages across multiple performance metrics. Therefore, based on these analyses, Joint appears to have the edge in the upcoming match.
Joint vs Navarro Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Maya Joint
Player
Ann Li
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Maya Joint
Player
Katie Volynets
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maya Joint
Player
Ana Konjuh
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Maya Joint
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
115)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
46 of
81)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Maya Joint
Player
Viktorija Golubic
77%
(
72 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
112)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Maya Joint
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Maya Joint
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Navarro
Player
Maya Joint
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
0
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
66% (104/53) | Win/Loss | 64% (221/125) |
62% (227/138) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (479/311) |
56% (1840/1472) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3947/3241) |
65% (60/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (82/57) |
72% (31/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (117/59) |
60% (9/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (8/3) |
67% (4/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 70% (14/6) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
175 | Aces Total | 481 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
462 | Total Double Faults | 935 |
1:36:9 | Average Match Time | 1:29:28 |
216.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 287.41 |
65% (6832/10528) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13701/22128) |
60% (4131/6832) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (8599/13701) |
48% (1788/3695) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3991/8426) |
51% (713/1389) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1397/2907) |
48% (4984/10320) | Return Points Win % | 47% (10456/22195) |
64% (7/4) | Slam W/L | 66% (19/10) |
67% (8/4) | Masters W/L | 50% (22/22) |
50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
68% (15/7) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (45/30) |
67% (70/35) | Challenger W/L | 68% (127/59) |
60% (3/2) | Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) |
65% (100/153) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (215/340) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
53% (18/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (30/62) |
59% (30/51) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (58/99) |
87% (103/90) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (197/184) |
13% (103/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (197/13) |
26% (54/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (149/36) |