Maya Joint vs Ann Li Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W W W L
Form
W W L W L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Joint 2 - 0 Li
They have played 0 sets in total, with Joint winning 0 and Li winning 0. The last match between Joint and Li was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat, 22-05-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Maya Joint getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maya Joint | 2 |
| Ann Li | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat(22-05-2025)
Maya Joint
Ann Li
6
2
6
1
| Joint | Stats | Li |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (38-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (16-15) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 41 | Ranking | 65 |
| 41 | Highest Rank | 44 |
| 19 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 5 |
| 67% (114-57) | Career Total W/L | 59% (246-169) |
| $353,368 | Career Prize Money | $1,570,459 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Maya Joint
Player
Ann Li
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Ann Li
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Joint vs Li Match Preview :
- Li has slightly better second serve performance, winning 42.03% of points compared to Joint's 40.89% in recent months. Could this give Li a slight edge?
- In return games, Joint outperforms Li, winning 51.18% on second serve returns and 34.36% on first serve returns, compared to Li's 49.76% and 31.64% respectively. Will Joint's superior return skills be a deciding factor?
- Both players handle pressure similarly, with Joint saving 49.89% of breakpoints and Li saving 48.62%. Does this make their match-up under pressure evenly matched?
- Li has a match win rate of 64.29% over the past year, just under Joint's 65.17%. Which suggests they are quite evenly matched overall.
- On their best surface, clay, Joint has a career win rate of 71% compared to Li's 64%. Does this surface preference favor Joint in this match-up?
- Li has a slight advantage in Challenger/ITF tournament performance, winning 68.75% of matches, whereas Joint has won 63.83% in similar events. Will this impact the outcome?
- Their only direct head-to-head match was won by Joint with a score of 6-4, 6-2. Could this previous victory be a confidence booster for Joint?
- The quality of opponents they've faced is nearly identical with Li facing an average rank of 227.81 and Joint 224.17.
- In deciding sets, Li has a superior win rate of 61%, slightly ahead of Joint's 59%. If the match goes to a deciding set, will Li have the advantage?
- Joint's break point conversion rate in recent games is significantly higher at 47.68%, compared to Li's 40.13%. Will this be crucial during breakpoint chances?
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent statistics between Li and Joint reveals some interesting insights that could influence the outcome of their upcoming match.
While Li shows a slight edge in second serve performance and a better record in deciding sets, Joint's superior return game and past head-to-head victory suggest an advantage.
Furthermore, Joint's higher break point conversion rate indicates a potential edge in high-pressure situations during the match.
Taking all factors into account, including their performance on clay and recent head-to-head outcome, Maya Joint appears to be the more likely victor in their upcoming clash.
Joint vs Li Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maya Joint Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Maya Joint
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Alexandra Eala
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Anna Blinkova
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Emma Raducanu
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
111)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Ons Jabeur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Maya Joint
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Maya Joint
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
24%
(
6 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
54 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
55 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Ann Li
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Viktorija Golubic
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Ann Li
74%
(
71 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Ann Li
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
48%
(
54 of
113)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Anastasia Potapova
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Ann Li
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Ann Li
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (114/57) | Win/Loss | 59% (246/169) |
| 63% (248/148) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (541/410) |
| 56% (1997/1599) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4641/4127) |
| 65% (60/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (134/92) |
| 72% (36/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (76/44) |
| 60% (9/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (27/16) |
| 69% (9/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 35% (9/17) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 196 | Aces Total | 920 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 512 | Total Double Faults | 992 |
| 1:35:51 | Average Match Time | 1:28:15 |
| 265.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 358.26 |
| 64% (7375/11447) | 1st Serve % | 60% (16500/27325) |
| 61% (4463/7375) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (10453/16500) |
| 48% (1964/4071) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5118/10825) |
| 52% (779/1512) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1595/3322) |
| 48% (5454/11274) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12184/26891) |
| 54% (7/6) | Slam W/L | 46% (21/25) |
| 67% (8/4) | Masters W/L | 43% (13/17) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (22/8) | Main Tour W/L | 61% (50/32) |
| 67% (73/36) | Challenger W/L | 63% (153/91) |
| 60% (3/2) | Futures W/L | 69% (9/4) |
| 66% (109/166) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (239/405) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 56% (20/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (47/89) |
| 58% (32/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (73/124) |
| 87% (114/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (231/201) |
| 13% (114/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (231/30) |
| 26% (57/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (184/45) |
Joint vs. Li Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
