M. Neuchrist
To Win
T. A. Tirante
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L L W WForm
L W W W L W L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Neuchrist winning 0 and Agamenone winning 2. The last match between Neuchrist and Agamenone was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 19-02-2025, Second, Clay with Franco Agamenone getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Maximilian Neuchrist | 0 |
Franco Agamenone | 1 |
Brazzaville Challenger(19-02-2025)
Neuchrist | Stats | Agamenone |
---|---|---|
62% (8-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (10-6) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
479 | Ranking | 416 |
182 | Highest Rank | 108 |
33 | Age | 31 |
R | Plays | R |
15 | Titles | 14 |
60% (468-307) | Career Total W/L | 58% (405-297) |
$5,955 | Career Prize Money | $36,150 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
26 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Maximilian Neuchrist
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
5 | Games Won | 12 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:31:19 | Average Match Time | 1:31:19 |
62% (40/65) | 1st Serve % | 67% (31/46) |
65% (26/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (26/31) |
40% (10/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (10/15) |
0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
22% (10/46) | Return Points Win % | 45% (29/65) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Prediction Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match
When it comes to analyzing key statistics in recent form, we can draw valuable predictions for the upcoming tennis match between Neuchrist and Agamenone.
Examining the performance of their second serve, Neuchrist has demonstrated an impressive mastery, triumphing in 53.45% of points during the last six months. In contrast, Agamenone has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 48.45%. This statistical correlation carries substantial weight in accurately foretelling the outcome of the match.
In analyzing their return game stats, Neuchrist has proven adept at capitalizing on their opponent's second serve, winning 51.38% of these points. Conversely, Agamenone has displayed a higher proficiency in this area, securing 54.61% of these crucial points. First serve returns, on the other hand, reveal Neuchrist's winning percentage stands at 36.2%, while Agamenone exhibits a slightly more favorable rate of 41.3%. This data significantly aids in determining the favored contender in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
Considering their performance under pressure, Neuchrist has demonstrated exceptional resilience, successfully saving 65.22% of breakpoints in recent form. Agamenone, while not far behind, has managed to save 61.59% of these critical moments. This particular statistical insight holds value in making informed in-game betting predictions.
Shifting our focus to the overall performance, Neuchrist has showcased an impressive dominance by winning 72.41% of matches played in the past year, resulting in a win-loss record of 21/8. Conversely, Agamenone has displayed commendable prowess, with a win percentage of 52.54% (31/28) during the same period. Factoring in these figures allows us to form a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
An intriguing aspect to consider is each player's performance on different surfaces. Neuchrist has achieved their highest career surface win percentage on Hard, boasting a remarkable 64% success rate (235/130). However, on Grass, Neuchrist struggles, recording a win percentage of 0% (0/1). Looking at Agamenone's proficiency, they excel on Hard surfaces, attaining a win percentage of 59% (34/24). However, their performance weakens on Grass, with a win percentage of 0% (0/4).
Taking a closer look at the players' level, Neuchrist mainly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level in the past year, achieving an impressive 76.92% win rate in those matches (20/6). In contrast, Agamenone competed primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K, securing a win percentage of 45.16% (14/17). It is essential to note that the relative event level they have been engaging in influences the assessment of each player's statistics.
Further analyzing the quality of opponents faced, Neuchrist's formidable opponents have held an average rank of 268.21 over the past 12 months. Conversely, Agamenone has confronted players with a slightly higher average rank of 356.02. These opponent quality stats provide additional context in predicting the outcome of this highly anticipated match.
Considering the performance in deciding sets, a vital aspect for live predictions and betting, Neuchrist has demonstrated poise by sealing victory in 50% of deciding sets over the past year. Agamenone, an equally formidable contender, has triumphed in 58% of all matches played on tour. These statistics shed light on their ability to perform under pressure in deciding sets.
While past player performance serves as a valuable indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is also crucial to examine current event stats to gauge the form of the players. Therefore, we should refer to the section below for current event insights (if applicable) as certain players exhibit superior performances in specific events, which directly influences the outcome selection process.
Turning our attention to break point conversion, Neuchrist has proven proficient at seizing opportunities, converting 45.88% of breakpoint chances in recent times. In comparison, Agamenone displays a slightly higher success rate, capitalizing on 47.84% of opportunities to break their opponents' serve. This pivotal statistic serves as a valuable tool for in-game live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in comprehensive models that predict tennis outcomes, the following article offers a valuable starting point (Caution: Suitable for statistical enthusiasts only).
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Evan Zhu
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Ray Ho
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Maximilian Neuchrist
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Andrej Martin
Player
Maximilian Neuchrist
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
109)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
52 of
81)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Max Houkes
66%
(
80 of
121)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
45 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Calvin Hemery
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Maximilian Neuchrist
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Leonardo Monferrer
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Maximilian Neuchrist
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-8 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luciano Darderi
Player
Franco Agamenone
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Martin Klizan
59%
(
65 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Paul Jubb
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrej Martin
Player
Franco Agamenone
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Dusan Obradovic
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Royer
Player
Franco Agamenone
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
14 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
18 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Andrej Martin
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
110)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
118
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
14
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Franco Agamenone
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60% (468/307) | Win/Loss | 58% (405/297) |
59% (1030/723) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (906/715) |
53% (9088/7926) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7853/7078) |
65% (237/130) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) |
58% (146/107) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (366/261) |
55% (85/69) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (5/8) |
0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
2772 | Aces Total | 818 |
0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
1001 | Total Double Faults | 1461 |
1:8:55 | Average Match Time | 1:18:32 |
556.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 417.09 |
65% (24211/36967) | 1st Serve % | 68% (23229/34406) |
71% (17242/24211) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (14784/23229) |
52% (6673/12756) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5279/11176) |
41% (1331/3256) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1872/3980) |
38% (13910/36992) | Return Points Win % | 44% (15233/34809) |
0% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 25% (4/12) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
31% (5/11) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (5/4) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
53% (145/128) | Challenger W/L | 51% (118/114) |
66% (318/164) | Futures W/L | 63% (277/166) |
61% (462/758) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (401/696) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
54% (160/295) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (76/148) |
54% (118/217) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (118/217) |
88% (446/394) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (410/348) |
12% (446/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (410/61) |
22% (328/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (292/55) |
View full predicted draw for Neuchrist
View full predicted draw for Agamenone