Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maximilian Marterer vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marterer vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Maximilian Marterer vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marterer has won 52.83% of points on his second serve, while Nakashima has won 56.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marterer, in recent form, has won 52.06% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 49.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.57% and 31.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marterer has saved 61.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 71.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marterer has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 40/ 28), with Nakashima winning 58.67% (W/L 44/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marterer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 69/ 46), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Marterer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 8), where as Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marterer winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Marterer winning 3 and Nakashima winning 3. The last match between Marterer and Nakashima was at the Danderyd Challenger, 19-11-2023, Final, I.hard with Maximilian Marterer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marterer and Nakashima have played a deciding set 2 times, with Marterer winning 1 times and Nakashima 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Marterer winning 1, and Nakashima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marterer has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.9 while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 233.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marterer has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marterer has converted 38.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 35.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marterer 1 - 1 Nakashima
101
Rank
45
High
28
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
87
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
59% (381-261)
Career Total W/L
61% (184-116)
27% (4-11)
YTD W/L
72% (26-10)
$1,511,690
Career Prize Money
$1,608,265
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maximilian Marterer | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 27 | 31 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:27 | 2:2:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (105/186) | 64% (103/162) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (84/105) | 79% (81/103) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (33/81) | 54% (32/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 21% (3/14) | 38% (6/16) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (49/162) | 37% (69/186) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Brandon Nakashima
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 6-7(1) 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Maximilian Marterer
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maximilian Marterer | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (4/11) | 72% (26/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 31% (11/24) | 68% (54/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (158/195) | 55% (439/362) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 73% (11/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.71 |
| Aces Total | 67 | 278 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:46 | 1:44:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 189 | 294.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (712/1140) | 65% (1625/2494) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (477/712) | 75% (1222/1625) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (206/428) | 57% (498/869) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (26/68) | 34% (73/217) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (370/1077) | 37% (976/2634) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 27% (3/8) | 67% (4/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (1/0) | 79% (19/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (4/14) | 71% (25/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 71% (12/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 88% (25/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 12% (25/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 30% (10/3) |
Maximilian Marterer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
38 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(5) 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Maximilian Marterer
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Maximilian Marterer
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Maximilian Marterer
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Luca Van Assche
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
16
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Yanki Erel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Maximilian Marterer
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Marterer Vs Nakashima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
