MATCHSTAT

Maxime Chazal vs Yassine Smiej Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

H2H RecordsCareer Stats

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Chazal vs Y. Smiej

Maxime Chazal
Maxime Chazal

Flag FRA FRA

l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
Yassine Smiej
Yassine Smiej

Flag MAR MAR

l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

32
Age
25
5'9" (175 cm)
Height
-
569
C. Rank
0
234
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.9K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Chazal 1 - 0 Smiej

They have played 2 sets in total, with Maxime Chazal winning 2 and Yassine Smiej winning 0. The last match between Maxime Chazal and Yassine Smiej was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 6-0 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Chazal1
Smiej0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Brazzaville Challenger(02-18-25)

Clay
FRA Flag
Maxime Chazal
6
6
MAR Flag
Yassine Smiej
0
3

M. Chazal vs Y. Smiej H2H Profile

FRAM. Chazal
Stats
MARY. Smiej
$2,860Career Prize Money$0
60.29% (507-334)Career Total W/L52.11% (74-68)
1Clay0
15Titles0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

M. Chazal vs Y. Smiej Match Preview:

    Predictions for the upcoming tennis match:
  • Recent second serve performance: In the past six months, Chazal has exhibited an impressive second serve performance, winning 50.06% of points, while Smiej has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 37.88%. This stat has proven to be highly correlated with match prediction accuracy, providing valuable insights.
  • Return game stats: Recent return game stats show that Chazal has been dominant in winning 52.81% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Smiej has displayed a strong performance, winning 55.64% in this aspect. Additionally, Chazal's success rate for first serve returns stands at 34.53%, while Smiej's rate is slightly higher at 35.09%. These figures hold significant correlation in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Analyzing performance under pressure, Chazal has proven to be a formidable opponent, successfully saving 60.33% of breakpoints in recent matches. In contrast, Smiej's ability to save breakpoints stands at 44.16%. This statistic holds considerable importance for accurate in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Examining the players' overall performance during the past year, Chazal has emerged victorious in 64.94% of their matches (with a win/loss ratio of 50/27), whereas Smiej has achieved a win rate of 49.02% (with a win/loss ratio of 25/26). This comprehensive overview of their head-to-head record aids in predicting the outcome of their upcoming match.
  • Best surface: Chazal has showcased their excellence on clay courts, achieving a remarkable 64% win rate (446 wins out of 256 matches), while their performance on indoor hard courts is relatively lower at 31% (8 wins out of 18 matches). Conversely, Smiej's success rate is highest on hard courts, with a 54% win rate (37 wins out of 32 matches), and their weakest performance can be observed on clay courts, with a 43% win rate (12 wins out of 16 matches).
  • Player level: Over the past year, Chazal has primarily competed in tournaments such as the Futures/Satellites/ITF with a $10,000 prize, winning an impressive 73.58% of their matches (39 wins out of 14 matches). On the other hand, Smiej has also participated in similar level events, achieving a win rate of 49.02% (25 wins out of 26 matches). It is crucial to consider the players' statistical comparison within the context of the event level they have been competing in when predicting the favored player.
  • Opponent quality stats: Evaluating the quality of opponents faced in the last 12 months, Chazal has encountered players with an average rank of 413.12, while Smiej has faced opponents with an average rank of 160.22. These opponent quality statistics provide further insight into the players' competitiveness.
  • Deciding set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, if the match reaches a deciding set, Chazal has demonstrated exceptional performance, winning 65% of decisive sets in the past 12 months. Alternatively, Smiej has achieved a 36% success rate in all matches played on the tour. These statistics are key indicators for predicting the outcome of matches in real-time.
  • Current event H2H stats: While analyzing past player performance is undoubtedly useful in predicting tennis matches, it is equally vital to consider current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Further insights can be found in the section below (if the players have already competed in the current event). Additionally, certain players may exhibit enhanced performance levels at specific events, which must be taken into account when making predictions.
  • Break point conversion: Assessing recent form, Chazal has capitalized on 47.16% of breakpoint opportunities, while Smiej has successfully converted 46.61% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These figures prove crucial in providing valuable in-game live betting tips during pivotal moments when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • For individuals interested in utilizing prediction models for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent resource to explore such predictive tools. However, it is advised that only true statistics enthusiasts should proceed further.

    • Maxime Chazal vs Yassine Smiej Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

    M. Chazal vs Y. Smiej H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

    FRAM. Chazal
    		Stats
    MARY. Smiej
    1H2H Matches Won0
    2Sets Won0
    12Games Won3
    0Aces (Total)2
    2Total Double Faults12
    1:18:43Average Match Time1:18:43
    72% (33/46)1st Serve %45% (25/55)
    79% (26/33)1st Serve Win %68% (17/25)
    62% (8/13)2nd Serve Win %33% (10/30)
    40% (4/10)Break Pts Won %0% (0/2)
    51% (28/55)Return Points Win %26% (12/46)
    100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
    100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
    0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
    0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

    Recent Performance Stats

    2nd Serve Win %: Chazal 50%, Smiej 42%.
    Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Chazal 55%, Smiej 51%.
    Break Points Saved %: Chazal 58%, Smiej 47%.

    M. Chazal Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
    ClayM15 Bol - 27-10-2025

    QF

    ROUC. Cretu
    L
    		6-4 6-2

    R2

    GERA. Latifovic
    W
    		5-2 ret.

    R1

    ROUD. Uta
    W
    		6-3 6-1
    ClayM15 Bol - 20-10-2025

    QF

    UKRV. Bielinskyi
    L
    		3-6 6-2 6-4

    R2

    ROUN. David
    W
    		7-5 6-3
    View All

    Y. Smiej Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
    HardM15 Monastir - 13-10-2025

    R1

    ARGT. Agustin
    L
    		6-0 6-3

    Q3

    USAE. Thornton
    W
    		6-2 4-6 10-8

    Q1

    HKGR. Kato
    W
    		6-3 6-0
    HardM15 Monastir - 06-10-2025

    R1

    ITAG. Marco
    L
    		2-6 6-4 6-3
    HardM15 Monastir - 08-09-2025

    Q3

    DENO. Brostrom
    L
    		6-4 6-1
    View All
    banner

    M. Chazal vs Y. Smiej Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    FRAM. Chazal
    		Stats
    MARY. Smiej
    60.29% (507/334)YTD Win/Loss52.11% (74/68)
    58.10% (1115/804)Sets Win/Loss51.74% (164/153)
    53.53% (9542/8282)Games Win/Loss50.88% (1525/1472)
    43.48% (30/39)Hard Win/Loss54.95% (61/50)
    62.87% (469/277)Clay Win/Loss41.94% (13/18)
    30.77% (8/18)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
    0.12Aces Per Game0.02
    1057Aces Total28
    0.17Double Faults Per Game0.22
    1473Total Double Faults321
    1:19:45Average Match Time1st Match
    566.24Average Opponent Rank185.39
    68% (28327/41913)1st Serve %69% (2710/3946)
    65% (18335/28327)1st Serve Win %56% (1517/2710)
    49% (6630/13585)2nd Serve Win %41% (502/1236)
    47% (2200/4721)Break Points Won % (Total)45% (177/396)
    43% (17613/40855)Return Points Win %42% (1600/3805)
    0.00% (0/2)Slam W/L0% (0/0)
    18.18% (2/9)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
    42.50% (68/92)Challenger W/L0.00% (0/1)
    65.42% (437/231)Futures W/L52.48% (74/67)
    61% (500/820)Best of 3 Sets Win %51% (72/140)
    0% (0/4)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
    51% (100/197)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)73% (11/15)
    59% (151/254)Deciding Set Win %49% (17/35)
    88% (480/420)1st Set Won, Won Match84% (80/67)
    12% (480/58)1st Set Won, Lost Match15% (80/12)
    24% (360/87)1st Set Lost, Won Match10% (62/6)

    Other Tennis Predictions Today

    02:30 PM 12/11/25
    Prediction
    CROM. Dodigq
    GBRA. FeryALT
    W1
    2.8
    W2
    1.37
    07:30 PM 12/11/25
    Prediction
    CANJ. Boulais
    USAT. Mccormick
    W1
    1.53
    W2
    2.31
    12:00 PM 13/11/25
    Prediction
    USAT. Fritz
    AUSA. D. Minaur
    W1
    1.57
    W2
    2.48
    04:00 PM 12/11/25
    Prediction
    ITAF. Maestrelli
    CZEV. Kopriva2
    W1
    2.33
    W2
    1.52
    06:05 AM 12/11/25
    Prediction
    CZEH. Barton
    JPNR. Sakamoto6
    W1
    1.85
    W2
    1.83
    10:30 PM 12/11/25
    Prediction
    ITAJ. Sinner
    GERA. Zverev
    W1
    1.14
    W2
    6.15

    Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

    11 Nov 2025

    Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets

    Read Full Article →
    11 Nov 2025

    Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets

    Read Full Article →
    11 Nov 2025

    Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025

    Read Full Article →
    11 Nov 2025

    Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets

    Read Full Article →
    11 Nov 2025

    Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets

    Read Full Article →
    11 Nov 2025

    Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets

    Read Full Article →
    view all tennis previews