Maxime Chazal vs Petr Brunclik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W W L L
Form
L W L W W L W W W LH2H: Chazal 1 - 0 Brunclik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chazal winning 2 and Brunclik winning 0. The last match between Chazal and Brunclik was at the Prague Challenger, 07-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maxime Chazal | 1 |
| Petr Brunclik | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Prague Challenger(07-05-2025)
Maxime Chazal
Petr Brunclik
6
4
6
3
| Chazal | Stats | Brunclik |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (17-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (22-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 399 | Ranking | 502 |
| 234 | Highest Rank | 502 |
| 32 | Age | 18 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (492-324) | Career Total W/L | 60% (52-35) |
| $2,860 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fearnley VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Diallo VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Maxime Chazal
Player
Petr Brunclik
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:28:34 | Average Match Time | 1:28:34 |
| 64% (39/61) | 1st Serve % | 69% (33/48) |
| 69% (27/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (4/15) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 54% (26/48) | Return Points Win % | 39% (24/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chazal vs Brunclik Match Preview :
- Brunclik shows a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 45.32% compared to Chazal's 43.87% over the last six months. Does this give Brunclik an advantage? Indeed, it suggests better serve stability.
- In return games, Brunclik has also outperformed Chazal with 49.82% of second serve return points won versus 47.97%. First serve return points are similarly close, with Brunclik at 29.17% and Chazal at 29.01%.
- When evaluating under pressure, Brunclik has saved 56.99% of breakpoints, marginally more efficient than Chazal's 53.67%.
- Analyzing overall performance in the last year reveals Brunclik's win rate at 61.36%, closely matched by Chazal's 61.04%.
- Brunclik excels on Hard courts with a 73% win rate, while Chazal's preferred surface is Clay, achieving a 63% win rate.
- At the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF level, Chazal has performed better with a 71.11% win rate compared to Brunclik’s 59.46%.
- The quality of opponents is similar, with Brunclik facing an average rank of 392.41 and Chazal 391.44.
- In deciding sets, Chazal has a higher success rate of 60% over the last year, compared to Brunclik’s 46%.
- Finally, Chazal excels in breakpoint conversion, managing a notable 39.77%, which surpasses Brunclik’s 26.06%.
Editorial Prediction (May 6, 2025, UTC):
As we look at the comparative statistics, Brunclik demonstrates a mild advantage in serving and returning second serves, suggesting a slight edge in controlling rallies and potentially stabilizing under pressure situations.
However, Chazal’s consistency in higher breakpoint conversion and superior capacity to navigate deciding sets indicates a spirited resilience that could prove decisive in critical moments.
While both players have performed differently on varying surfaces, the current matchup leans towards Chazal’s strengths, particularly in pressure moments and converting opportunities into game wins.
Given the closely matched abilities, Chazal’s efficient breakpoint conversion and ability to seal deciding sets give him the edge as the likely winner in this upcoming match.
Chazal vs Brunclik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Maxime Chazal
81%
(
66 of
81)
1st Serve %
83%
(
69 of
83)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Maxime Chazal
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
74%
(
65 of
88)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Petr Brunclik
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
1
Aces
15
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
79%
(
66 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Benjamin Hassan
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
103)
1
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
10
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Maxime Chazal
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Maxime Chazal
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
11
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Petr Brunclik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Petr Brunclik
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Jose Pereira
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Oscar Otte
31%
(
8 of
26)
1st Serve %
41%
(
12 of
29)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
36
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Tim Handel
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Petr Brunclik
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Masamichi Imamura
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(13) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Petr Brunclik
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (492/324) | Win/Loss | 60% (52/35) |
| 58% (1083/780) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (116/84) |
| 53% (9260/8050) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (999/879) |
| 43% (30/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 73% (19/7) |
| 63% (454/267) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (29/22) |
| 31% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (4/6) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1014 | Aces Total | 203 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1392 | Total Double Faults | 203 |
| 1:18:45 | Average Match Time | 1:41:26 |
| 558.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 388 |
| 68% (27211/40256) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3393/5236) |
| 65% (17603/27211) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2253/3393) |
| 49% (6362/13044) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (932/1843) |
| 47% (2107/4529) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (263/678) |
| 43% (16862/39175) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2373/5672) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (66/88) | Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 65% (424/225) | Futures W/L | 61% (44/28) |
| 61% (486/797) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (52/86) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (98/190) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (10/20) |
| 59% (146/246) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (16/28) |
| 88% (466/409) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (48/44) |
| 12% (466/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (48/4) |
| 24% (349/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (38/8) |
Chazal vs. Brunclik Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
