M. Chazal
To Win
A. Reymond
To Win
Maxime Chazal vs Jeremy Gschwendtner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L W L W W
Form
W W L L L W W W W LH2H: Chazal 1 - 0 Gschwendtner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chazal winning 2 and Gschwendtner winning 0. The last match between Chazal and Gschwendtner was at the M15 Valencia, 06-02-2025, Second, Clay with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maxime Chazal | 1 |
| Jeremy Gschwendtner | 0 |
M15 Valencia(06-02-2025)
6
3
6
1
| Chazal | Stats | Gschwendtner |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (13-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (7-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 326 | Ranking | N/A |
| 234 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 32 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 0 |
| 60% (488-320) | Career Total W/L | 58% (79-57) |
| $2,860 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Chazal VS Gschwendtner H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Maxime Chazal
Player
Jeremy Gschwendtner
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Chazal VS Gschwendtner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:23:21 | Average Match Time | 1:23:21 |
| 65% (24/37) | 1st Serve % | 59% (29/49) |
| 88% (21/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (17/29) |
| 62% (8/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 49% (24/49) | Return Points Win % | 22% (8/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Raphael Vaksmann
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Marko Banicevic
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Maxime Chazal
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julio Cesar Porras
Player
Maxime Chazal
73%
(
77 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Parisca
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Maxime Chazal
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Maxime Chazal
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremy Gschwendtner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Jeremy Gschwendtner
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Gschwendtner
Player
Nemanja Malesevic
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Battiston
Player
Jeremy Gschwendtner
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 16-14 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Jeremy Gschwendtner
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Gschwendtner
Player
Nicolo Toffanin
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
4
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (488/320) | Win/Loss | 58% (79/57) |
| 58% (1072/770) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (175/129) |
| 54% (9159/7943) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1498/1274) |
| 43% (30/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) |
| 63% (450/263) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (63/43) |
| 31% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1011 | Aces Total | 49 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1353 | Total Double Faults | 140 |
| 1:18:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 560.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 166.03 |
| 68% (26758/39592) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1812/2865) |
| 65% (17319/26758) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1118/1812) |
| 49% (6270/12833) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (494/1053) |
| 47% (2075/4456) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (134/298) |
| 43% (16588/38519) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1194/2831) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (62/85) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (424/224) | Futures W/L | 58% (79/57) |
| 61% (482/789) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (75/132) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 52% (97/188) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (12/24) |
| 60% (144/241) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (13/32) |
| 88% (463/407) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (79/71) |
| 12% (463/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (79/8) |
| 24% (344/81) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (57/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
