Maxime Chazal vs Benjamin Hassan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W W L L
Form
L W W L W W W L L LHead To Head: Chazal 1 - 0 Hassan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Chazal winning 2 and Hassan winning 1. The last match between Chazal and Hassan was at the Prague Challenger, 04-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 2-6 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maxime Chazal | 1 |
| Benjamin Hassan | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Prague Challenger(04-05-2025)
Maxime Chazal
Benjamin Hassan
2
6
7
5
6
2
| Chazal | Stats | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (17-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (17-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 399 | Ranking | 195 |
| 234 | Highest Rank | 143 |
| 32 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 2 |
| 60% (492-324) | Career Total W/L | 59% (324-227) |
| $2,860 | Career Prize Money | $340,000 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Yunchaokete VS Djere PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fearnley VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Maxime Chazal
Player
Benjamin Hassan
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
103)
1
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
10
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:16:29 | Average Match Time | 2:16:29 |
| 48% (41/86) | 1st Serve % | 50% (52/103) |
| 66% (27/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (31/52) |
| 36% (16/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (20/51) |
| 41% (7/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (6/8) |
| 50% (52/103) | Return Points Win % | 50% (43/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chazal vs Hassan Match Preview :
Analyzing second serve performance in recent form reveals that Hassan has secured 44.59% of points on their second serve, slightly outperforming Chazal, who has achieved 43.91%. In the sphere of tennis predictions, this statistic plays a pivotal role and closely correlates with forecast accuracy, as the ability to win points on the second serve can often dictate match outcomes.
Performance figures on an overview basis over the last year indicate Hassan's win rate stands at 49.33% (W/L 37/38), trailing behind Chazal's 58.67% (W/L 44/31). This overarching record shapes the head-to-head evaluation of their competitive standing, providing significant insight when forecasting the match result. Furthermore, attention should be paid to the fact that Chazal tends to play against marginally lower-ranked opponents, averaging a 213.73 rank compared to Hassan's average opponent ranking of 221.43.
When it comes to return game stats, Hassan has exhibited marginal superiority by winning 47.06% of points off their opponent’s second serve, compared to Chazal’s 46.28%. Their efficiency on first serve returns also varies, with Hassan leading slightly at 29.78% versus Chazal's 28.4%. This marginal edge underlines Hassan’s ability to exert pressure during their opponents' service games.
Evaluating their capability under pressure, Hassan has demonstrated a stronger ability to save breakpoints, with a success rate of 57.56% in recent matches, opposed to Chazal’s 52.75%. This metric is particularly indicative for live betting, suggesting Hassan's resilience in crucial points. Conversely, in terms of breakpoint conversion, Hassan also holds an advantage at 42.03%, surpassing Chazal's 36.42%. Such statistics are crucial as they provide insights into each player’s efficacy in capitalizing on opportunities during games.
Surface performance further distinguishes these competitors. Both Hassan and Chazal have excelled most on clay, with Chazal boasting a higher winning percentage of 63% (W/L 450/265) compared to Hassan’s 61% (W/L 192/121). Conversely, Hassan struggles most on grass with a 40% win rate, while Chazal finds inner hard courts challenging, securing wins only 31% of the time, contingent upon their experience and adaptability.
Evaluating player levels reveals that Hassan predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF events over $10K, yielding a balanced outcome of 50% (W/L 29/29), whereas Chazal has performed at a higher success rate of 71.11% (W/L 32/13) in Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits at the $10K tier. This discrepancy highlights the relative competitiveness and form of each player, considering the event levels they typically engage with.
In brink situations like deciding sets, Chazal exhibits slightly superior performance, clinching 57% of these matches over the last year, marginally better than Hassan’s 54%. This subtly hints at Chazal's elevated composure and endurance in closely contested encounters.
Tallying these critical statistics along with past performances, Chazal emerges as the slight favorite due to their higher overall win ratio and consistency on preferred surfaces. Consequently, based on these analytical insights, Chazal is projected to be the likely victor in this impending tennis face-off.
Chazal vs Hassan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Maxime Chazal
81%
(
66 of
81)
1st Serve %
83%
(
69 of
83)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Maxime Chazal
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
74%
(
65 of
88)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Petr Brunclik
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
1
Aces
15
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
79%
(
66 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Benjamin Hassan
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
103)
1
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
10
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Maxime Chazal
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Maxime Chazal
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
11
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Benjamin Hassan
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
11
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
6
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Benjamin Hassan
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Hassan
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Pavel Kotov
40%
(
36 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Benjamin Hassan
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Damir Dzumhur
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (492/324) | Win/Loss | 59% (324/227) |
| 58% (1083/780) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (736/573) |
| 53% (9260/8050) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6474/6001) |
| 43% (30/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (59/41) |
| 63% (454/267) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (197/124) |
| 31% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (66/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1014 | Aces Total | 1919 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1392 | Total Double Faults | 1625 |
| 1:18:45 | Average Match Time | 1:24:26 |
| 558.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.61 |
| 68% (27211/40256) | 1st Serve % | 55% (19149/34601) |
| 65% (17603/27211) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (13197/19149) |
| 49% (6362/13044) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7793/15455) |
| 47% (2107/4529) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1448/3460) |
| 43% (16862/39175) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13779/34611) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 50% (6/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 68% (15/7) |
| 18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (10/11) |
| 43% (66/88) | Challenger W/L | 54% (164/138) |
| 65% (424/225) | Futures W/L | 68% (125/60) |
| 61% (486/797) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (315/539) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 52% (98/190) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (91/171) |
| 59% (146/246) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (115/207) |
| 88% (466/409) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (302/260) |
| 12% (466/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (302/41) |
| 24% (349/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (249/62) |
Chazal vs. Hassan Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
