Max Hans Rehberg vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L W L L
Form
L L L W W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Rehberg 1 - 0 Wild
They have played 3 sets in total, with Rehberg winning 2 and Wild winning 1. The last match between Rehberg and Wild was at the Naples Challenger, 25-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Max Hans Rehberg getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Max Hans Rehberg | 1 |
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Naples Challenger(25-03-2025)
3
6
6
3
6
4
| Rehberg | Stats | Wild |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (10-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (8-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 245 | Ranking | 120 |
| 230 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 21 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 9 |
| 55% (115-94) | Career Total W/L | 55% (250-202) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $930,785 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fils VS Zverev PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Giron VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
11 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:26:48 | Average Match Time | 2:26:48 |
| 69% (69/100) | 1st Serve % | 61% (54/88) |
| 70% (48/69) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (40/54) |
| 52% (16/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (17/34) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 35% (31/88) | Return Points Win % | 36% (36/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rehberg vs Wild Match Preview :
In analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, both players have shown a close competition. Rehberg has secured 46.99% of points on their second serve, while Wild has managed slightly better with 47.04%. This marginal difference could play a significant role in predicting match outcomes. Similarly, Rehberg's return game statistics reveal a stronger performance, winning 45.11% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Wild's 43.29%. This edge is also seen in first serve return stats, where Rehberg leads with 26.8% against Wild's 23.81%, a metric with a high correlation to identifying the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
The under-pressure statistics provide additional insights. Wild has displayed resilience by saving 59.76% of breakpoints, overshadowing Rehberg's 52%. This could offer a useful angle for in-game betting predictions. Looking at the overall performance over the last year, Rehberg has achieved a win rate of 61.04% with a win-loss record of 47/30, whereas Wild holds a lower win percentage at 44.44% with a 24/30 record. These figures provide an overarching perspective on their competitive form.
Examining surface preferences, Rehberg shows a robust performance on indoor hard courts, winning 60% of matches (43/29), but struggles on grass with a 0% win rate (0/3). In contrast, Wild excels on clay, boasting a 58% win rate (200/143), while their performance dips on indoor hard courts at 41% (7/10). The players’ competition level also varies; Rehberg has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.15% of these (43/22), whereas Wild has competed more on the Main tour, maintaining a win rate of 56% (14/11). The level of competition and opponent quality is crucial, with Rehberg facing opponents averaging a rank of 327.95 over the last year, whereas Wild has squared off against players averaging a rank of 118.59.
When the match leads to a deciding set, Wild holds a slight advantage, winning 60% compared to Rehberg's 58% over the last 12 months. In terms of break point conversion, Wild leads with a conversion rate of 30.77%, ahead of Rehberg’s 27.63%. As current event head-to-head statistics become available, they can further refine predictions, but overall, based on current data, Wild appears to have the statistical edge likely to win this match.
Max Hans Rehberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
76 of
103)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
16
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Johannus Monday
73%
(
61 of
83)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(5) 4-6 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Constant Lestienne
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Christoph Negritu
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Nuno Borges
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jesper De Jong
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Pierluigi Basile
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Blockx
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Nerman Fatic
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
16 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (115/94) | Win/Loss | 55% (250/202) |
| 54% (263/221) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (589/479) |
| 51% (2371/2279) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5319/4890) |
| 50% (4/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (33/37) |
| 51% (49/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (205/149) |
| 61% (62/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (7/10) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 586 | Aces Total | 1887 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 521 | Total Double Faults | 1271 |
| 1:40:33 | Average Match Time | 1:44:36 |
| 384.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 344.4 |
| 67% (9822/14638) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18975/30956) |
| 68% (6642/9822) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (13243/18975) |
| 51% (2459/4816) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6108/11981) |
| 43% (557/1297) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1210/2947) |
| 38% (5489/14350) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12123/31060) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 37% (10/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 60% (18/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/11) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (38/48) |
| 57% (67/51) | Challenger W/L | 57% (130/98) |
| 60% (48/32) | Futures W/L | 70% (53/23) |
| 55% (113/207) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (243/431) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 57% (51/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (75/154) |
| 48% (32/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (65/144) |
| 84% (116/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (267/221) |
| 16% (116/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (267/46) |
| 19% (93/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (185/29) |
Rehberg vs. Wild Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
