Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matwe Middelkoop vs Go Soeda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Middelkoop vs Soeda analysis and find out who is favored!
Matwe Middelkoop vs Go Soeda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Middelkoop has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Soeda has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Middelkoop, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Soeda has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Middelkoop has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Soeda has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Middelkoop has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Soeda winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Middelkoop has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 256/ 161), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 22% (W/L 2/ 7). Soeda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 476/ 305), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 19/ 31).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Middelkoop winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Middelkoop winning 2 and Soeda winning 0. The last match between Middelkoop and Soeda was at the Irving Challenger, 13-03-2017, Q2 round, Hard with Matwe Middelkoop getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Middelkoop and Soeda have played a deciding set 0 times, with Middelkoop winning 0 times and Soeda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Middelkoop winning 0, and Soeda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Middelkoop has played against opponents with an average rank of while Soeda has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Middelkoop has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Soeda has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Middelkoop has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Soeda has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Middelkoop 1 - 0 Soeda
668
Rank
197
High
40
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
683
Rank
47
High
39
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
58% (418-303)
Career Total W/L
58% (658-471)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$46,533
Career Prize Money
$791,590
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Middelkoop VS Soeda H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Matwe Middelkoop | Go Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Middelkoop VS Soeda H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matwe Middelkoop | Go Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matwe Middelkoop Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
15
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
25 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(9) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dustin Brown
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matwe Middelkoop
Player
Tommy Paul
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matwe Middelkoop
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexandre Sidorenko
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matwe Middelkoop
Player
Romain Barbosa
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrey Golubev
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Go Soeda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Go Soeda
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Go Soeda
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Go Soeda
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Go Soeda
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Go Soeda
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Go Soeda
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Go Soeda
76%
(
90 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
80 of
117)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Ulises Blanch
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
115)
6
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Viktor Durasovic
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
35 of
42)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Middelkoop Vs Soeda Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
