MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Matthew Summers vs Cannon Kingsley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-to-head: Summers 0 - 1 Kingsley

They have played 2 sets in total, with Summers winning 0 and Kingsley winning 2. The last match between Summers and Kingsley was at the M15 Naples, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 6-2 6-0.

M15 Naples(19-02-2025)

43% (3-4)
YTD Win/Loss
50% (7-7)
0
Head-to-Head
1
865
Ranking
534
864
Highest Rank
404
26
Age
23
-
Plays
R
0
Titles
1
58% (74-54)
Career Total W/L
58% (125-89)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
1
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp

15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Jack Draper

To Win

30.95 %
9.3%

Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp

14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Daniil Medvedev

To Win

64.9 %
2.01%

Summers VS Kingsley H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 6-0
cross
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Matthew Summers
66% ( 27 of 41)
1st Serve %
66% ( 37 of 56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
57% ( 8 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
29% ( 12 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 31 of 56)
60
Total Points Won
37

Summers VS Kingsley H2H Stats

Matthew Summers Summers
Stats
Cannon Kingsley Kingsley
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
2
Games Won
12
1
Aces (Total)
4
4
Total Double Faults
0
1:18:49
Average Match Time
1:18:49
66% (37/56)
1st Serve %
66% (27/41)
46% (17/37)
1st Serve Win %
78% (21/27)
42% (8/19)
2nd Serve Win %
57% (8/14)
0% (0/3)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (5/12)
29% (12/41)
Return Points Win %
55% (31/56)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Matthew Summers vs Cannon Kingsley Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Matthew Summers 0 - 1 Cannon Kingsley

Predictions Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match:

  1. Recent Second Serve Performance: Examining their recent form over the last six months, it is noteworthy that Summers has triumphed in 52.51% of points on their second serve, while Kingsley has emerged victorious in 54.17%. It is pertinent to mention that there exists a substantial correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
  2. Return Game Statistics: In terms of return game statistics, recent form indicates that Summers has secured success in 48.82% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Kingsley has attained a slightly higher percentage of 49.54%. Furthermore, the statistics for first serve returns stand at 38.48% for Summers and 31.16% for Kingsley respectively. Remarkably, these statistics hold a strong correlation to determine the favored contender in their head-to-head matchup.
  3. Under Pressure Analysis: Analyzing their ability to perform under pressure, Summers has successfully saved 62.9% of breakpoints in recent encounters, while Kingsley has demonstrated a 60.4% save rate. This useful statistic can aid in predicting in-game betting outcomes.
  4. Performance Overview: Assessing their overall performance within the past year, Summers has triumphed in 59.15% of matches played with a win/loss record of 42/29, whereas Kingsley has achieved a win percentage of 54.76% (W/L 23/19). These statistics provide a comprehensive overview for predicting their head-to-head contest.
  5. Surface Specialization: Notably, Summers exhibits their best career surface win percentage on grass, attaining a remarkable 67% (W/L 4/2), while their performance on indoor hard courts is comparatively weaker with a success rate of only 20% (W/L 1/4). Conversely, Kingsley showcases their highest career surface win percentage on clay, boasting a commendable 64% (W/L 28/16), and experiences a lower success rate on hard courts, winning 57% of matches (W/L 56/43).
  6. Player Level: Within the past year, Summers has predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize fund. During this period, they have secured victory in 59.15% of their matches (W/L 42/29). On the other hand, Kingsley has primarily participated in the same category of tournaments, achieving a win percentage of 64% (W/L 16/9). It is crucial to evaluate these statistics in relation to the respective event levels when predicting the favored player.
  7. Opponent Quality Analysis: Over the course of the last 12 months, Summers has faced opponents with an average rank of 270.93, while Kingsley has encountered players with an average rank of 432.33. These figures shed light on the caliber of opponents each player has encountered.
  8. Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is noteworthy that Summers has emerged victorious in 39% of deciding sets played within the last 12 months. In contrast, Kingsley boasts a higher success rate, winning 71% of such sets in all matches played on the tour.
  9. Current Event Head-To-Head Statistics: While past player performance is indeed valuable in predicting tennis matches, once an event is underway, it becomes imperative to consider current event statistics to gauge the form of each player. To access the current event stats, kindly refer to the section below (assuming the players have already competed in the current event). Furthermore, it is worth considering that certain players may excel at specific events, and this factor should be taken into account when determining the outcome.
  10. Break Point Conversion Rate: Evaluating recent form, we observe that Summers has successfully converted 48.97% of breakpoint opportunities, while Kingsley has capitalized on 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These valuable statistics provide insightful guidance for in-game live betting when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  11. If you are inclined towards models and techniques that predict tennis matches, we recommend perusing this article as a solid starting point. However, we must caution that the content is primarily intended for statistics enthusiasts.

Matthew Summers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Matthew Summers
66% ( 27 of 41)
1st Serve %
66% ( 37 of 56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
57% ( 8 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
29% ( 12 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 31 of 56)
60
Total Points Won
37
L
6-2 6-0 H2H
QF
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
1-6 7-6(3) 10-8 H2H
QF
cross
Naoki Tajima
Player
Matthew Summers
29% ( 2 of 7)
1st Serve %
50% ( 2 of 4)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100% ( 2 of 2)
1st Serve Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
80% ( 4 of 5)
2nd Serve Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
14% ( 1 of 7)
Rtn Points Won
100% ( 4 of 4)
10
Total Points Won
1
L
4-1 ret. H2H
Q1
cross
Matthew Summers
Player
Lorenzo Galigani
56% ( 18 of 32)
1st Serve %
58% ( 18 of 31)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
94% ( 17 of 18)
1st Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
79% ( 11 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 4 of 13)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
13% ( 4 of 32)
Rtn Points Won
71% ( 22 of 31)
50
Total Points Won
13
W
6-1 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Luca Preda
Player
Matthew Summers
78% ( 54 of 69)
1st Serve %
74% ( 56 of 76)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
67% ( 36 of 54)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 34 of 56)
47% ( 7 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 9 of 20)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
38% ( 26 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 33 of 76)
76
Total Points Won
69
L
7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Matthew Summers
Player
Thijmen Loof
57% ( 31 of 54)
1st Serve %
56% ( 30 of 54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71% ( 22 of 31)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
39% ( 9 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 8 of 24)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
43% ( 23 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 33 of 54)
64
Total Points Won
44
W
6-3 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Ryan Peniston
Player
Matthew Summers
67% ( 34 of 51)
1st Serve %
67% ( 37 of 55)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
74% ( 25 of 34)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
71% ( 12 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
27% ( 14 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 26 of 55)
63
Total Points Won
43
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Matthew Summers
Player
Yua Taka
75% ( 18 of 24)
1st Serve %
55% ( 16 of 29)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78% ( 14 of 18)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 10 of 16)
100% ( 6 of 6)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 6 of 13)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
17% ( 4 of 24)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 13 of 29)
33
Total Points Won
20
W
6-3 1-0 ret. H2H
R1
W
4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 H2H

Cannon Kingsley Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
56% ( 42 of 75)
1st Serve %
67% ( 45 of 67)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
67% ( 28 of 42)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 26 of 45)
36% ( 12 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 11 of 22)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 5 of 15)
47% ( 35 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 30 of 67)
70
Total Points Won
72
L
4-6 7-5 10-6 H2H
R1
cross
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Markus Bolin
68% ( 23 of 34)
1st Serve %
74% ( 34 of 46)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
70% ( 16 of 23)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 15 of 34)
45% ( 5 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 6 of 12)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
38% ( 13 of 34)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 25 of 46)
46
Total Points Won
34
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
47% ( 43 of 91)
1st Serve %
66% ( 76 of 116)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70% ( 30 of 43)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 45 of 76)
42% ( 20 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 17 of 40)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
45% ( 41 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 54 of 116)
104
Total Points Won
103
L
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Felix Corwin
Player
Cannon Kingsley
69% ( 25 of 36)
1st Serve %
70% ( 33 of 47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76% ( 19 of 25)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 19 of 33)
36% ( 4 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 6 of 14)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
36% ( 13 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 22 of 47)
45
Total Points Won
38
L
7-6(3) 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73% ( 27 of 37)
1st Serve %
56% ( 29 of 52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
70% ( 7 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 9 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 31 of 52)
59
Total Points Won
30
W
6-0 6-1 H2H
QF
W
w/o H2H
R1
cross
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Matthew Summers
66% ( 27 of 41)
1st Serve %
66% ( 37 of 56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
57% ( 8 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
29% ( 12 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 31 of 56)
60
Total Points Won
37
W
6-2 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Cannon Kingsley
64% ( 36 of 56)
1st Serve %
64% ( 35 of 55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67% ( 24 of 36)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 19 of 35)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
36% ( 20 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 29 of 55)
65
Total Points Won
46
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Charles Bertimon
70% ( 46 of 66)
1st Serve %
70% ( 51 of 73)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72% ( 33 of 46)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 35 of 51)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
32% ( 21 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 28 of 73)
73
Total Points Won
66
W
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Arvid Nordquist
65% ( 55 of 85)
1st Serve %
61% ( 38 of 62)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69% ( 38 of 55)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 26 of 38)
63% ( 19 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
33% ( 28 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 23 of 62)
80
Total Points Won
67
W
6-3 7-6(4) H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

58% (74/54)
Win/Loss
58% (125/89)
59% (167/118)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (279/211)
53% (1468/1312)
Games Win/Loss
54% (2518/2147)
60% (67/45)
Hard Win/Loss
56% (57/45)
33% (1/2)
Clay Win/Loss
64% (30/17)
29% (2/5)
Indoor Hard W/L
58% (38/27)
67% (4/2)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.14
Aces Per Game
0.53
188
Aces Total
1218
0.12
Double Faults Per Game
0.18
170
Total Double Faults
406
1:2:15
Average Match Time
1:31:49
255.96
Average Opponent Rank
415.34
67% (3419/5107)
1st Serve %
62% (8148/13173)
67% (2276/3419)
1st Serve Win %
72% (5843/8148)
48% (817/1688)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (2622/5024)
45% (235/517)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (515/1266)
41% (2114/5119)
Return Points Win %
39% (5151/13174)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L
48% (35/38)
58% (74/54)
Futures W/L
65% (90/49)
58% (73/126)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (123/211)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
63% (22/35)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
38% (23/61)
34% (10/29)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (34/65)
86% (79/68)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (124/108)
14% (79/11)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (124/16)
12% (49/6)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
19% (90/17)

See recent tennis photos of Summers and Kingsley

Other Predictions

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells

flag
16 Mar
flag
01:00
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Cherbourg Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...