Matthew Christopher Romios vs Leon Hoeveler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Romios vs Hoeveler analysis and find out who is favored!
Matthew Christopher Romios vs Leon Hoeveler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Romios has won 49.39% of points on his second serve, while Hoeveler has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Romios, in recent form, has won 41.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hoeveler has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.1% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Romios has saved 51.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hoeveler has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Romios has won 40% of matches played (W/L 8/ 12), with Hoeveler winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Romios has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 52/ 74). Hoeveler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 14/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 9/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Romios has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 4/ 10), where as Hoeveler has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Romios winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Romios winning 2 and Hoeveler winning 0. The last match between Romios and Hoeveler was at the M15 Heraklion, 03-11-2021, First, Hard with Matthew Christopher Romios getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Romios and Hoeveler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Romios winning 0 times and Hoeveler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Romios winning 0, and Hoeveler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Romios has played against opponents with an average rank of 303.5 while Hoeveler has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Romios has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hoeveler has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Romios has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hoeveler has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Romios 1 - 0 Hoeveler
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
889
Rank
563
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
44% (91-114)
Career Total W/L
40% (105-156)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Leon Hoeveler |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:18:0 | 1:18:0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (27/51) | 71% (35/49) |
1st Serve Win% | 85% (23/27) | 51% (18/35) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (13/24) | 43% (6/14) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/4) |
Return Points W% | 51% (25/49) | 29% (15/51) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Leon Hoeveler
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Leon Hoeveler |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 18% (2/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 37% (36/62) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.89 | 0 |
Aces Total | 42 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
DFs Total | 7 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:16:9 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 417.8 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (195/303) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (126/195) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 44% (48/108) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 29% (4/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 28% (83/295) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matthew Christopher Romios Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Ezekiel Clark
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
24
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Thomas Fancutt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
25
Total Points Won
15
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Colin Sinclair
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tao Mu
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Leon Hoeveler Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 7-5 | H2H |
view more