Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Viola vs Uladzimir Ignatik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Viola vs Ignatik analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Viola vs Uladzimir Ignatik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Viola has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ignatik has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Viola, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ignatik has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Viola has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ignatik has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Viola has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ignatik winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Viola has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 119/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Ignatik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 150/ 108), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Viola winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Viola winning 0 and Ignatik winning 2. The last match between Viola and Ignatik was at the Bergamo Challenger, 18-02-2019, First, I.hard with Uladzimir Ignatik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Viola and Ignatik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Viola winning 0 times and Ignatik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Viola winning 0, and Ignatik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Viola has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ignatik has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Viola has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ignatik has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Viola has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ignatik has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Viola 0 - 1 Ignatik
831
Rank
118
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
869
Rank
129
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
53% (563-490)
Career Total W/L
57% (537-402)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$206,441
Career Prize Money
$205,460
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matteo Viola | Uladzimir Ignatik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:1 | 1:19:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (45/74) | 74% (46/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (26/45) | 65% (30/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (13/29) | 69% (11/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (21/62) | 47% (35/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Matteo Viola
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Viola | Uladzimir Ignatik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matteo Viola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Pavel Nejedly
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matteo Viola
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Matteo Viola
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Uladzimir Ignatik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Umut Akkoyun
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Calin Manda
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
33 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bondarevskiy
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
69 of
117)
3
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
119
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Lior Goldenberg
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
6
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Hanyi Liu
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Chien-Hsun Lo
33%
(
4 of
12)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
7
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
76 of
130)
10
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
71%
(
27 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
26 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
130)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Viola Vs Ignatik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
