Matteo Viola vs Patrik Niklas-Salminen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Viola vs Niklas-Salminen analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Viola vs Patrik Niklas-Salminen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Viola has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Viola, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Viola has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niklas-Salminen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Viola has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Niklas-Salminen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Viola has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 119/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Niklas-Salminen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 48/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Viola winning 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Viola winning 2 and Niklas-Salminen winning 4. The last match between Viola and Niklas-Salminen was at the Tampere Challenger, 24-07-2019, Second, Clay with Patrik Niklas-Salminen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Viola and Niklas-Salminen have played a deciding set 2 times, with Viola winning 0 times and Niklas-Salminen 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Viola winning 0, and Niklas-Salminen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Viola has played against opponents with an average rank of while Niklas-Salminen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Viola has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Viola has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niklas-Salminen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Viola 0 - 2 Niklas-Salminen
17
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
831
Rank
118
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
881
Rank
418
High
27
Age
L
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
53% (563-490)
Career Total W/L
53% (164-147)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$206,441
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Viola VS Niklas-Salminen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Matteo Viola | Patrik Niklas-Salminen |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 2 | 4 |
Games Won | 26 | 29 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 9 |
DFs (Total) | 15 | 14 |
Avg Match Time | 2:17:36 | 2:17:36 |
1st Serve % | 61% (107/175) | 62% (131/210) |
1st Serve Win% | 64% (69/107) | 64% (84/131) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (34/68) | 46% (36/79) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 23% (7/30) | 38% (9/24) |
Return Points W% | 43% (90/210) | 41% (72/175) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Viola VS Niklas-Salminen H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-6 6-4 6-1 |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Matteo Viola
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
6-4 3-6 7-5 |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
10
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matteo Viola | Patrik Niklas-Salminen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matteo Viola Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matteo Viola
Player
Pavel Nejedly
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matteo Viola
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Matteo Viola
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Patrik Niklas-Salminen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Valentin Royer
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
10
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
65 of
78)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
29 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Karol Drzewiecki
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Woerner
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Aleksi Lofman
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Peetu Pohjola
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Oskari Eerola
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alastair Gray
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Billy Blaydes
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more