M. Moeller
To Win
C. Chidekh
To Win
Matteo Martineau vs Clement Chidekh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L W L
Form
L L W W L L L L W LHead-2-Head: Martineau 1 - 0 Chidekh
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martineau winning 2 and Chidekh winning 0. The last match between Martineau and Chidekh was at the Glasgow Challenger, 17-02-2025, First, I.hard with Matteo Martineau getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matteo Martineau | 1 |
| Clement Chidekh | 0 |
Glasgow Challenger(17-02-2025)
6
4
7
6
| Martineau | Stats | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (12-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (6-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 262 | Ranking | 268 |
| 170 | Highest Rank | 184 |
| 26 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 10 |
| 55% (294-243) | Career Total W/L | 66% (153-79) |
| $40,205 | Career Prize Money | $13,980 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Zheng PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Matteo Martineau
Player
Clement Chidekh
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:31:57 | Average Match Time | 1:31:57 |
| 66% (41/62) | 1st Serve % | 69% (48/70) |
| 83% (34/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (32/48) |
| 62% (13/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (11/22) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 39% (27/70) | Return Points Win % | 24% (15/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matteo Martineau vs Clement Chidekh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Matteo Martineau 1 - 0 Clement Chidekh
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match
Over the past six months, the performance on second serves has been a crucial factor in determining match outcomes. In this regard, Martineau has achieved a 46.67% success rate, while Chidekh has managed an impressive 52.05% victory. The high correlation between this statistical indicator and accurate match predictions cannot be overlooked.
Analyzing the return game statistics, Martineau has displayed exceptional form in recent matches. They have won 44.86% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Chidekh has recorded a remarkable 55.84% success rate in this aspect. For first serve returns, Martineau's stats stand at 25.62%, while Chidekh has secured a 33.86% efficiency. These statistics hold significant weight in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
A closer look at how players perform under pressure can offer valuable insights for in-game betting predictions. Martineau has demonstrated their ability to save breakpoints, successfully rescuing 70.95% of such situations. In comparison, Chidekh has managed to save 63.42% of breakpoints. These statistics prove useful in assessing the players' performance in critical moments.
Taking an overview of their overall performance, Martineau has won 41.38% of matches played in the last year, with a win-loss record of 24/34. Conversely, Chidekh boasts an impressive 66.28% winning rate, with a win-loss record of 57/29. These figures provide us with a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head clash.
Examining the players' performance on different surfaces, Martineau has achieved their highest career win percentage on Hard courts, winning an impressive 59% of matches. However, their performance on Grass courts is less favorable, with a win percentage of 43%. In contrast, Chidekh excels on Indoor Hard courts, boasting a win percentage of 69%, while they struggle on Grass courts, with a win percentage of 33%. Surface preferences must be considered when making predictions regarding the outcome of their match.
Player level and the tournaments they have competed in are also influential factors to consider. Martineau has primarily participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money surpassing $10,000. Within this context, they have secured victory in 46.81% of matches played. On the other hand, Chidekh has predominantly competed in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a $10,000 prize pool. Impressively, they have emerged victorious in 80.95% of matches played. When predicting the favored player based on statistics, it is necessary to consider the relative event level at which they have played.
Considering the quality of opponents faced, Martineau's average opponent rank in the past 12 months was 244.55. In contrast, Chidekh has faced players with an average rank of 364.66. These opponent quality statistics add context to the players' achievements and attribute them to their respective rankings.
The ability to perform at their best during deciding sets is a factor worth considering for live predictions and betting. In the last 12 months, Martineau has had success in 35% of deciding sets, while Chidekh has achieved a commendable 56% victory rate in all matches played on tour.
While past player performance serves as a useful indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is essential to analyze current event statistics to assess players in form. As the event progresses, the performance of players in the current event becomes increasingly relevant. Consideration should also be given to the players' track records at specific events to accurately predict the outcome.
Break point conversion statistics provide valuable insights for in-game live betting. Martineau has converted 35.48% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Chidekh has capitalized on 40.87% of their chances to break their opponents' serves. These figures offer crucial information for betting tips when a player has a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. However, it is worth noting that it caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts.
Over the past six months, the performance on second serves has been a crucial factor in determining match outcomes. In this regard, Martineau has achieved a 46.67% success rate, while Chidekh has managed an impressive 52.05% victory. The high correlation between this statistical indicator and accurate match predictions cannot be overlooked.
Analyzing the return game statistics, Martineau has displayed exceptional form in recent matches. They have won 44.86% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Chidekh has recorded a remarkable 55.84% success rate in this aspect. For first serve returns, Martineau's stats stand at 25.62%, while Chidekh has secured a 33.86% efficiency. These statistics hold significant weight in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
A closer look at how players perform under pressure can offer valuable insights for in-game betting predictions. Martineau has demonstrated their ability to save breakpoints, successfully rescuing 70.95% of such situations. In comparison, Chidekh has managed to save 63.42% of breakpoints. These statistics prove useful in assessing the players' performance in critical moments.
Taking an overview of their overall performance, Martineau has won 41.38% of matches played in the last year, with a win-loss record of 24/34. Conversely, Chidekh boasts an impressive 66.28% winning rate, with a win-loss record of 57/29. These figures provide us with a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head clash.
Examining the players' performance on different surfaces, Martineau has achieved their highest career win percentage on Hard courts, winning an impressive 59% of matches. However, their performance on Grass courts is less favorable, with a win percentage of 43%. In contrast, Chidekh excels on Indoor Hard courts, boasting a win percentage of 69%, while they struggle on Grass courts, with a win percentage of 33%. Surface preferences must be considered when making predictions regarding the outcome of their match.
Player level and the tournaments they have competed in are also influential factors to consider. Martineau has primarily participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money surpassing $10,000. Within this context, they have secured victory in 46.81% of matches played. On the other hand, Chidekh has predominantly competed in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a $10,000 prize pool. Impressively, they have emerged victorious in 80.95% of matches played. When predicting the favored player based on statistics, it is necessary to consider the relative event level at which they have played.
Considering the quality of opponents faced, Martineau's average opponent rank in the past 12 months was 244.55. In contrast, Chidekh has faced players with an average rank of 364.66. These opponent quality statistics add context to the players' achievements and attribute them to their respective rankings.
The ability to perform at their best during deciding sets is a factor worth considering for live predictions and betting. In the last 12 months, Martineau has had success in 35% of deciding sets, while Chidekh has achieved a commendable 56% victory rate in all matches played on tour.
While past player performance serves as a useful indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is essential to analyze current event statistics to assess players in form. As the event progresses, the performance of players in the current event becomes increasingly relevant. Consideration should also be given to the players' track records at specific events to accurately predict the outcome.
Break point conversion statistics provide valuable insights for in-game live betting. Martineau has converted 35.48% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Chidekh has capitalized on 40.87% of their chances to break their opponents' serves. These figures offer crucial information for betting tips when a player has a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. However, it is worth noting that it caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts.
Matteo Martineau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Matteo Martineau
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 4-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Matteo Martineau
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Kenny de Schepper
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
79%
(
77 of
98)
11
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
60 of
72)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
64 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
26 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
23 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Lukas Pokorny
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
9
Aces
18
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
21 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Dan Added
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
75 of
128)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
49 of
75)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
53 of
128)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Matteo Martineau
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
10
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
41 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Clement Chidekh
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Clement Chidekh
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Joris De Loore
55%
(
11 of
20)
1st Serve %
79%
(
15 of
19)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
28
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Clement Chidekh
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Clement Chidekh
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Luca Van Assche
51%
(
57 of
112)
1st Serve %
71%
(
82 of
116)
6
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
50 of
82)
49%
(
27 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Clement Chidekh
55%
(
79 of
144)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
16
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
46%
(
30 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
41%
(
59 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
128
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Clement Chidekh
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (294/243) | Win/Loss | 66% (153/79) |
| 55% (689/575) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (332/196) |
| 52% (6287/5846) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2671/2151) |
| 59% (55/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (70/31) |
| 53% (120/107) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) |
| 55% (116/94) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (75/39) |
| 43% (3/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2730 | Aces Total | 521 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1562 | Total Double Faults | 673 |
| 1:35:4 | Average Match Time | 1:33:2 |
| 465.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 393.36 |
| 64% (22387/35069) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9023/14479) |
| 72% (16107/22387) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (6069/9023) |
| 48% (6145/12682) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2830/5456) |
| 41% (1375/3383) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (800/1693) |
| 39% (13840/35935) | Return Points Win % | 43% (6541/15094) |
| 14% (1/6) | Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 26% (5/14) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (118/118) | Challenger W/L | 49% (31/32) |
| 62% (170/105) | Futures W/L | 74% (116/40) |
| 54% (288/529) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (149/227) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 54% (103/192) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (25/49) |
| 46% (91/199) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (38/67) |
| 82% (308/252) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (150/135) |
| 18% (308/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (150/15) |
| 17% (228/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (82/17) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Clement Chidekh
View full predicted draw for Chidekh in Dizier
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
