M. Gigante
To Win
S. Shimabukuro
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W W W LForm
W L L L W W L L W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Gigante winning 2 and Cilic winning 1. The last match between Gigante and Cilic was at the Mauthausen Challenger, 29-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 4-6 6-1 7-6(4).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Matteo Gigante | 1 |
Marin Cilic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mauthausen Challenger(29-04-2025)
Gigante | Stats | Cilic |
---|---|---|
59% (19-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (14-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
130 | Ranking | 104 |
130 | Highest Rank | 3 |
23 | Age | 36 |
L | Plays | R |
6 | Titles | 26 |
59% (161-114) | Career Total W/L | 64% (697-389) |
$478,985 | Career Prize Money | $22,938,060 |
1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
14 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
14 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
14 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Marin Cilic
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
44%
(
41 of
93)
11
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 13 |
11 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
2:27:42 | Average Match Time | 2:27:42 |
55% (56/102) | 1st Serve % | 44% (41/93) |
75% (42/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (29/41) |
61% (28/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (28/52) |
27% (3/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
39% (36/93) | Return Points Win % | 31% (32/102) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When it comes to that tricky second serve, Cilic's recent heroic efforts have seen him win 47.96% of points, while Gigante slightly lags behind with 43.04%. If you’ve ever wondered who’s got the edge, just remember, consistency is key—unless you're trying to juggle tennis balls. Both players have been duking it out on the court with Gigante proving to be a formidable foe, winning 50.33% of his adversaries' second serve points, while the mighty Cilic isn't too far off with a commendable 42.61%.
Speaking of returns, Gigante's zany ability to pick off first serves leaves him with a spanking 26.91%, edging out Cilic's modest 25.7%. But when it comes to keeping their cool under pressure, Cilic's saved a commendable 59.73% of those pesky breakpoints, while Gigante's not-so-gigantic with 44.92%. That’s definitely something to chew on when deciding who is the Houdini of tennis.
These guys are busy beavers when it comes to matches, with Cilic raking in wins 60.61% in the last year against Gigante's 54.39%. On grass, Cilic is like a cat on catnip with a win rate of 72%, and his game slides down a bit to 63% on hard surfaces. Meanwhile, Gigante prefers those sturdy hard courts where his win rate is 71%, but finds indoor hard courts, at a measly 26%, to be a sticky wicket.
Diving into their resumes, Cilic has been headlining at the Challengers/ITF circuits with a respectable win rate of 70.59%, whereas Gigante pulls up with 55.26% in the same arena. They've faced off against foes with an average ranking of 141.82 for Cilic and 208.39 for Gigante over the past year. Sounds intense, right?
When it's nail-biting time in that deciding set, Cilic clinks his 69% winning glass, while Gigante swigs his successful 72%. And if those pesky breakpoints rear their heads again, Gigante's conversion rate of 34.81% handily bests Cilic's mysterious 21.36%. It's all fun and games until someone smashes a racquet.
The net verdict? Based on the stats, Gigante seems poised to have the edge. So, grab your popcorn and tie up those sneakers because if the numbers have spoken, Gigante is our predicted front-runner for this match-up. Watch out, Cilic—looks like Gigante's ready to bring his A-game!
Gigante vs Cilic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Ben Shelton
Player
Matteo Gigante
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
60%
(
76 of
126)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
121)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
33%
(
42 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Hassan
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jerome Kym
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Bublik
Player
Matteo Gigante
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jakub Mensik
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
No Recent Matches Available
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (161/114) | Win/Loss | 64% (697/389) |
56% (365/284) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (1741/1128) |
52% (3199/2926) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (15118/13114) |
71% (56/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (251/147) |
59% (93/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (192/116) |
26% (9/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (168/92) |
60% (3/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 72% (86/34) |
0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.64 |
875 | Aces Total | 8858 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
914 | Total Double Faults | 2893 |
1:34:53 | Average Match Time | 1:17:48 |
348.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.72 |
59% (11002/18531) | 1st Serve % | 57% (43391/76396) |
68% (7508/11002) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (33484/43553) |
50% (3729/7529) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (17319/33091) |
44% (869/1991) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (2752/7115) |
41% (7731/18787) | Return Points Win % | 38% (29789/78963) |
61% (14/9) | Slam W/L | 70% (147/62) |
45% (5/6) | Masters W/L | 53% (130/117) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 67% (36/18) |
20% (2/8) | Main Tour W/L | 69% (305/140) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 17% (2/10) |
57% (103/77) | Challenger W/L | 62% (47/29) |
73% (37/14) | Futures W/L | 74% (25/9) |
59% (156/264) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (529/850) |
38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 70% (161/229) |
57% (48/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (264/510) |
56% (52/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (213/366) |
80% (167/134) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (672/574) |
19% (167/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (672/97) |
23% (108/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (414/121) |