Matteo Gigante vs Jason Jung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W W L L
Form
W W L L W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Gigante 1 - 0 Jung
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gigante winning 2 and Jung winning 0. The last match between Gigante and Jung was at the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger, 20-01-2024, Semifinals, Hard with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matteo Gigante | 1 |
| Jason Jung | 0 |
Nonthaburi 3 Challenger(20-01-2024)
6
3
7
5
| Gigante | Stats | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (7-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 185 | Ranking | 856 |
| 132 | Highest Rank | 114 |
| 23 | Age | 35 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 8 |
| 58% (149-108) | Career Total W/L | 56% (412-327) |
| $280,090 | Career Prize Money | $350,585 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:25:29 | Average Match Time | 1:25:29 |
| 61% (42/69) | 1st Serve % | 68% (41/60) |
| 81% (34/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (30/41) |
| 52% (14/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 37% (22/60) | Return Points Win % | 30% (21/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sebastian Baez
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Matteo Gigante
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rohan Murali
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Matteo Gigante
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
8
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Matteo Gigante
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Matteo Gigante
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Jung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Aziz Dougaz
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Maximus Jones
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Jason Jung
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Jason Jung
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Yunseong Chung
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Zdenek Kolar
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (149/108) | Win/Loss | 56% (412/327) |
| 56% (337/263) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (943/772) |
| 52% (2947/2706) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8517/7832) |
| 71% (56/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (307/218) |
| 58% (81/58) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (31/32) |
| 26% (9/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (54/51) |
| 60% (3/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 43% (20/26) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 805 | Aces Total | 1910 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 857 | Total Double Faults | 1587 |
| 1:32:51 | Average Match Time | 1:12:25 |
| 341.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 545.88 |
| 59% (10052/17000) | 1st Serve % | 63% (25122/39622) |
| 68% (6852/10052) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (17225/25122) |
| 49% (3424/6948) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7428/14500) |
| 44% (804/1843) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1570/3886) |
| 41% (7105/17257) | Return Points Win % | 39% (15757/40281) |
| 53% (9/8) | Slam W/L | 39% (14/22) |
| 44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 18% (2/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 20% (2/8) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (37/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (97/73) | Challenger W/L | 55% (238/198) |
| 73% (37/14) | Futures W/L | 70% (119/52) |
| 59% (146/249) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (407/711) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 9% (2/22) |
| 57% (44/77) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (119/236) |
| 54% (45/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (112/215) |
| 80% (158/127) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (413/351) |
| 18% (158/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (413/62) |
| 20% (99/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (325/60) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
