Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Matteo Gigante vs Gianluca Bellezza Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gigante vs Bellezza analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Gigante vs Gianluca Bellezza Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gigante 1 - 0 Bellezza
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gigante has won 50.56% of points on their second serve, while Bellezza has won 37.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gigante, in recent form, has won 51.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bellezza has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.4% and 24.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gigante has saved 56.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bellezza has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gigante has won 61.29% of matches played (W/L 38/ 24), with Bellezza winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 46/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 9/ 21). Bellezza has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 32/ 14), where as Bellezza has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gigante winning 1 times and Bellezza being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gigante winning 2 and Bellezza winning 0. The last match between Gigante and Bellezza was at the Turin Challenger, 13-05-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gigante and Bellezza have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gigante winning 0 times and Bellezza 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gigante winning 0, and Bellezza 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gigante has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.84 while Bellezza has played against players with an average rank of 393.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gigante has won 84% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bellezza has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gigante has converted 35.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bellezza has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
150
Rank
132
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
59% (139-98)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-3)
63% (38-22)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$110,440
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Matteo Gigante vs Gianluca Bellezza For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gigante VS Bellezza
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Gianluca Bellezza |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:10 | 1:3:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (37/53) | 48% (25/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (28/37) | 72% (18/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (8/16) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (24/52) | 32% (17/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Matteo Gigante
Player
Gianluca Bellezza
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Gianluca Bellezza |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (38/22) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (79/60) | 20% (1/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (677/633) | 38% (19/31) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (24/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 240 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 229 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257.05 | 393.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (2569/4138) | 48% (25/52) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1754/2569) | 72% (18/25) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (794/1569) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (180/434) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1704/4245) | 32% (17/53) |
| Slam W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 73% (32/12) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (38/60) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (11/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 84% (16/19) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (32/30) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (32/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (28/8) | 0% (1/0) |
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Matteo Gigante
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Matteo Gigante
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Hugo Grenier
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Constant Lestienne
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
115)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Vesely
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Duje Ajdukovic
Player
Matteo Gigante
58%
(
64 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
11
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
36%
(
40 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jerome Kym
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
4
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Enzo Couacaud
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Charles Broom
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jurij Rodionov
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Gianluca Bellezza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Gianluca Bellezza
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Gigante Vs Bellezza Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gigante are available here and Bellezza photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Matteo Gigante
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
