Matteo Gigante vs Elmer Moller Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W L L
Form
W W L L W W L L L LHead-To-Head: Gigante 1 - 0 Moller
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gigante winning 2 and Moller winning 0. The last match between Gigante and Moller was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matteo Gigante | 1 |
| Elmer Moller | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(22-05-2025)
Matteo Gigante
Elmer Moller
6
3
7
6
| Gigante | Stats | Moller |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (21-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (18-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 134 | Ranking | 114 |
| 130 | Highest Rank | 108 |
| 23 | Age | 21 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 8 |
| 58% (163-116) | Career Total W/L | 66% (170-88) |
| $478,985 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cazaux VS Buse PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Loffhagen VS Opelka PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:50:0 | Average Match Time | 1:50:0 |
| 67% (52/78) | 1st Serve % | 61% (46/76) |
| 56% (29/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (28/46) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (12/30) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 47% (36/76) | Return Points Win % | 42% (33/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gigante vs Moller Match Preview :
- Moller's second serve win rate in the last six months stands at 42.5%, slightly lower than Gigante's 44.77%. Could this marginal difference play a role in the match outcome?
- When examining return game stats, Moller wins 47.96% of opponents' second serve points, while Gigante claims 49.01%, indicating Gigante's slight edge.
- In returning first serves, Moller outshines Gigante with a success rate of 29.48% compared to Gigante's 26.91%.
- Under pressure, Moller saves 55.02% of breakpoints, outperforming Gigante's 48.47%. Could this suggest Moller handles pivotal moments better?
- Overall, in the past year, Moller clinched 65.48% of matches, surpassing Gigante's 53.45% win rate.
- Moller excels on Clay with a win rate of 71%, whereas Gigante has a 71% win rate on Hard courts. How important is surface type in determining the winner?
- Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF > $10K events, with Moller securing 63.08% wins, eclipsing Gigante's 53.85%.
- Moller faces opponents with an average rank of 304.1, compared to Gigante's stronger opposition averaging a 213.4 ranking.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Gigante boasts a higher win rate of 68% versus Moller's 44%.
- Current event stats should also be considered, as they can reveal which player is in better form right now.
- Lastly, in breakpoint conversions, Gigante slightly leads with 34.97%, just above Moller's 33.13%.
Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming tennis match draws near, both players display strengths across different aspects. Moller's dominance on Clay could be pivotal, especially if conditions favor this surface.
However, Gigante's ability to perform well against higher-ranked opponents, coupled with a stronger deciding set performance, provides him with key advantages.
Despite Moller's higher overall win rate, Gigante's proficiency under competitive pressure may tilt the balance in his favor.
Considering all factors, Gigante appears slightly more likely to win this match, given his recent performance and ability to excel in crucial stages.
Gigante vs Moller Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Matteo Gigante
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
2
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Matteo Gigante
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
60%
(
76 of
126)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
121)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
33%
(
42 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Hassan
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Elmer Moller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Elmer Moller
57%
(
72 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
121)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
49 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
135
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Facundo Bagnis
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Elmer Moller
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (163/116) | Win/Loss | 66% (170/88) |
| 56% (370/290) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (376/210) |
| 52% (3251/2979) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (3065/2386) |
| 71% (56/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (37/28) |
| 59% (93/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (112/49) |
| 26% (9/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (21/11) |
| 56% (5/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 886 | Aces Total | 541 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 933 | Total Double Faults | 896 |
| 1:35:6 | Average Match Time | 1:31:42 |
| 347.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 400.77 |
| 59% (11227/18888) | 1st Serve % | 63% (10016/15910) |
| 68% (7670/11227) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (6693/10016) |
| 50% (3796/7661) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2783/5894) |
| 43% (876/2017) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (974/2055) |
| 41% (7855/19134) | Return Points Win % | 45% (7494/16484) |
| 58% (14/10) | Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 45% (5/6) | Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 20% (2/8) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (105/78) | Challenger W/L | 63% (63/37) |
| 73% (37/14) | Futures W/L | 69% (98/44) |
| 59% (158/268) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (168/251) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (49/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (34/67) |
| 56% (54/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (37/74) |
| 80% (170/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (170/149) |
| 19% (170/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (170/20) |
| 23% (109/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (88/21) |
Gigante vs. Moller Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
