Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Matteo De Vincentis vs Matteo Fondriest Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vincentis vs Fondriest analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo De Vincentis vs Matteo Fondriest Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vincentis 1 - 0 Fondriest
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vincentis has won 52.42% of points on their second serve, while Fondriest has won 49.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vincentis, in recent form, has won 53.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fondriest has won 54.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.91% and 38.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vincentis has saved 54.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fondriest has saved 53.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vincentis has won 67.8% of matches played (W/L 40/ 19), with Fondriest winning 56% (W/L 42/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vincentis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 120/ 83), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 27/ 26). Fondriest has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 27/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Vincentis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.8% of matches (W/L 40/ 19), where as Fondriest has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 42/ 33). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vincentis winning 1 times and Fondriest being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Vincentis winning 2 and Fondriest winning 1. The last match between Vincentis and Fondriest was at the M15 Gubbio, 14-07-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Matteo De Vincentis getting the victory 3-6 6-4 10-8.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vincentis and Fondriest have played a deciding set 1 times, with Vincentis winning 1 times and Fondriest 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vincentis winning 0, and Fondriest 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vincentis has played against opponents with an average rank of 200.27 while Fondriest has played against players with an average rank of 131.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vincentis has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fondriest has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vincentis has converted 48.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fondriest has converted 45.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (147-110)
Career Total W/L
52% (66-62)
68% (39-18)
YTD W/L
57% (36-27)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Matteo De Vincentis vs Matteo Fondriest For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Vincentis VS Fondriest
| stats | Matteo De Vincentis | Matteo Fondriest |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 10-8 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo De Vincentis | Matteo Fondriest |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (39/18) | 57% (36/27) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (85/43) | 57% (80/61) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (700/521) | 53% (726/635) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (37/15) | 60% (32/21) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 87 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.06 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:47 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.3 | 130.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1563/2462) | 57% (1084/1911) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (960/1563) | 66% (713/1084) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (464/899) | 49% (408/827) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (146/308) | 45% (100/223) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1158/2533) | 43% (843/1947) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (39/18) | 57% (36/27) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (38/56) | 56% (35/62) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 47% (7/15) | 43% (6/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (38/36) | 86% (35/30) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (38/2) | 14% (35/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 16% (19/3) | 21% (28/6) |
Matteo De Vincentis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Rafael Grosu
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Palosi
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
104)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Marcel Zielinski
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
74%
(
62 of
84)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Cezar Gabriel Papoe
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
78%
(
97 of
125)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
59 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Calin Teodor Stirbu
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Michal Krajci
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
62%
(
32 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calin Teodor Stirbu
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
56%
(
66 of
117)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Fondriest Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Matteo Fondriest
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandr Binda
Player
Matteo Fondriest
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Fondriest
Player
Leonardo Iemmi
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Matteo Fondriest
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fondriest
Player
Luca Fantini
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
86)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Fondriest
Player
Manuel Plunger
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Fondriest
Player
Leonardo Taddia
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
37 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 12-10 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Vincentis Vs Fondriest Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Vincentis are available here and Fondriest photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
