M. Navone
To Win
B. Nakashima
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L W LForm
W L W L W W L W L LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Berrettini winning 4 and Navone winning 1. The last match between Berrettini and Navone was at the Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters - Monte-Carlo, 07-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Matteo Berrettini getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Matteo Berrettini | 2 |
Mariano Navone | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters - Monte-Carlo(07-04-2025)
Berrettini | Stats | Navone |
---|---|---|
57% (13-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (15-16) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
28 | Ranking | 98 |
6 | Highest Rank | 29 |
29 | Age | 24 |
R | Plays | - |
15 | Titles | 6 |
67% (346-173) | Career Total W/L | 61% (238-150) |
$9,455,255 | Career Prize Money | $817,745 |
2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
23 May 2025 / Q3
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Mariano Navone
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Mariano Navone
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
80%
(
86 of
107)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
53 of
86)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
107
Total Points Won
86
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 1 |
30 | Games Won | 20 |
8 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:14:37 | Average Match Time | 2:14:37 |
70% (109/155) | 1st Serve % | 75% (129/173) |
72% (79/109) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (77/129) |
43% (20/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (17/44) |
43% (10/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
46% (79/173) | Return Points Win % | 36% (56/155) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the arena of second serve success over the last six months, Navone has clinched 48.22% of points, contrasted with Berrettini's marginally superior 50.23%. This metric is crucial because there's a noteworthy correlation between second serve prowess and predicting the match victor. Similarly, when it comes to returns, Navone has shown a recent knack for winning 45.55% of their opponent’s second serve points, narrowly outperforming Berrettini who stands at 43.86%. However, on first serve return points, Navone leads decisively with 28.99%, leaving Berrettini trailing with just 19.95%. Such statistics play a significant role in forecasting who might have the upper hand in future matchups.
Moreover, under pressure, Berrettini has demonstrated greater resilience, saving 64.97% of breakpoints compared to Navone’s 52.45% – a vital stat for those keen on in-game betting predictions. Additionally, in terms of converting breakpoints recently, Navone has been more efficient, capitalizing on 35.29% of opportunities, while Berrettini has managed 23.6%. Opponent quality is another factor to consider; Navone has faced competitors with an average rank of 75.48 over the past year, whereas Berrettini's foes have averaged a higher rank of 62.7, showcasing a slight advantage in the quality of opponents faced.
An overview of overall performance shows that in the past year Navone has managed a win rate of 44.64% (25 wins, 31 losses), whereas Berrettini boasts a more formidable win rate of 66.67% (36 wins, 18 losses). Surface proficiency also plays a key role; Navone excels on clay with a winning percentage of 65% (223 wins, 119 losses), whereas Berrettini is most dominant on grass with a remarkable 79% success rate (45 wins, 12 losses). Navone struggles significantly on grass with a win percentage of 0% (0 wins, 4 losses), while Berrettini’s weakest surface is indoor hard courts, where he has a win percentage of 55% (36 wins, 30 losses).
Concerning player level, Navone has participated predominantly in main tour matches, maintaining a 44.83% win rate (13 wins, 16 losses), while Berrettini has achieved a higher success rate of 71.88% (23 wins, 9 losses) in similar events. Their head-to-head history leans favorably toward Berrettini, who has won their singular previous encounter at the Grand Prix Hassan II in Marrakech, defeating Navone 6-7(4), 6-3, 6-2. The pressure of tie-breaks witnessed Navone winning 1 out of 1, although in deciding sets, Berrettini stands slightly favored, having won 44% compared to Navone’s 43% in the past 12 months.
Finally, taking into account their direct head-to-head performance, overall statistics, and considering Navone's success in tie-breaks but Berrettini's more consistent overall match success, Berrettini emerges as the statistically favored player to clinch victory in their upcoming encounter.
Berrettini vs Navone Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Casper Ruud
Player
Matteo Berrettini
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
45
Total Points Won
34
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jacob Fearnley
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Jack Draper
Player
Matteo Berrettini
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
46
Total Points Won
38
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Marcos Giron
77%
(
75 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
25 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
37 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(3) 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Matteo Berrettini
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Alexander Zverev
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Mariano Navone
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Taylor Fritz
Player
Matteo Berrettini
76%
(
78 of
102)
1st Serve %
78%
(
96 of
123)
16
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
72 of
96)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
25 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
123)
118
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
67% (346/173) | Win/Loss | 61% (238/150) |
63% (826/476) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (540/379) |
54% (7017/5993) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4660/4053) |
64% (146/81) | Hard Win/Loss | 33% (8/16) |
70% (105/46) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (228/125) |
60% (50/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (2/5) |
79% (45/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
0.65 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
4131 | Aces Total | 375 |
0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
844 | Total Double Faults | 968 |
1:40:8 | Average Match Time | 1:40:29 |
350.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 308.54 |
63% (22676/35861) | 1st Serve % | 66% (15684/23693) |
78% (17610/22676) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (9747/15684) |
54% (7056/13185) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3874/8009) |
38% (1127/2952) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1409/3007) |
36% (13393/37517) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11049/24376) |
69% (53/24) | Slam W/L | 20% (2/8) |
47% (34/39) | Masters W/L | 35% (6/11) |
75% (15/5) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
71% (112/46) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (25/22) |
25% (1/3) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
68% (71/34) | Challenger W/L | 66% (77/40) |
73% (60/22) | Futures W/L | 65% (126/67) |
67% (295/442) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (232/378) |
71% (51/72) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (4/8) |
56% (154/275) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (52/97) |
54% (85/156) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (71/134) |
86% (335/289) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (233/195) |
13% (335/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (233/38) |
32% (184/58) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (155/42) |