TBD
To Win
M. Rosenkranz
To Win
Mats Rosenkranz vs Iliyan Radulov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L L W L W
Form
L W L L L W W L W WHead-2-Head: Rosenkranz 1 - 0 Radulov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rosenkranz winning 2 and Radulov winning 0. The last match between Rosenkranz and Radulov was at the M15 Oberhaching, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Mats Rosenkranz getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mats Rosenkranz | 1 |
| Iliyan Radulov | 0 |
M15 Oberhaching(14-02-2025)
6
1
6
2
| Rosenkranz | Stats | Radulov |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (13-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (8-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 339 | Ranking | 537 |
| 336 | Highest Rank | 532 |
| 26 | Age | 19 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 2 |
| 51% (296-280) | Career Total W/L | 62% (78-48) |
| $4,755 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Rosenkranz
- / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
- / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Zheng PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rosenkranz VS Radulov H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Iliyan Radulov
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Rosenkranz VS Radulov H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:3:5 | Average Match Time | 1:3:5 |
| 73% (30/41) | 1st Serve % | 61% (28/46) |
| 87% (26/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 64% (7/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (10/18) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (23/46) | Return Points Win % | 20% (8/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mats Rosenkranz vs Iliyan Radulov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mats Rosenkranz 1 - 0 Iliyan Radulov
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, let us delve into the recent form of these formidable tennis players. Rosenkranz has demonstrated their prowess by emerging victorious in 50.84% of points on their second serve, whereas Radulov has outshined with a remarkable 53.27% success rate. It should be noted that this particular statistic bears a significant correlation to accurately predicting the outcome of a match.
Evaluating Return Game Stats: In the realm of return statistics, the recent performances of Rosenkranz are quite commendable. They have prevailed in 49.74% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Radulov has showcased exceptional skills in this aspect, triumphing in an impressive 57.55% of such points. The disparity is also palpable when comparing the success rates in first serve returns, with Rosenkranz exhibiting a 30.57% achievement and Radulov displaying an even higher rate of 34.36%. These figures hold substantial importance in forecasting the favored participant in their head-to-head battle.
A Detailed Under Pressure Analysis: When the heat is on, Rosenkranz has managed to save an admirable 65.06% of breakpoints in recent contests. In contrast, Radulov has saved 58% of these pivotal moments. Such statistics prove invaluable in making calculated predictions during in-game betting.
Comprehensive Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, both Rosenkranz and Radulov have been formidable competitors, leaving a trail of victories in their wake. Rosenkranz boasts an impressive win percentage of 65.08% (W/L41/22), while Radulov has exceeded expectations with a remarkable 67.44% success rate (W/L58/28). Delving into the realm of head-to-head encounters, these figures provide an all-encompassing overview, allowing for more accurate predictions.
Unearthing the Best Surface: When analyzing the preferred surfaces of the two players, it becomes evident that Rosenkranz's illustrious career has witnessed them achieve a significant 60% win rate (W/L9/6) on the prestigious grass. However, their performance on hard courts sees a slight decrease, with an appreciable 44% win rate (W/L54/68). Radulov, on the other hand, thrives on indoor hard courts, dominating with a flawless 100% win percentage (W/L3/0). Surprisingly, their performance on hard courts is less stellar, with a modest 50% win rate (W/L14/14).
Unveiling Player Level: Over the last year, both Rosenkranz and Radulov have honed their skills by participating in tournaments of varying levels. Rosenkranz primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, impressively winning 70% of their matches (W/L28/12). Simultaneously, Radulov also dedicated their efforts to this tournament category, achieving a commendable 70.13% success rate (W/L54/23). It is essential to consider the event level when comparing these statistics to predict the favored player.
Assessing Opponent Quality: The level of competition faced is a crucial aspect in evaluating a player’s performance. Over the past 12 months, Rosenkranz was pitted against opponents with an average rank of 217.3. In contrast, Radulov found themselves battling opponents with an average rank of 151.35. This data must be taken into account when making predictions.
Deciding Set Performance vs All Players: For enthusiasts intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, the players' performance in deciding sets holds substantial weight. Rosenkranz has emerged victorious in 65% of deciding sets throughout the past year, whereas Radulov has achieved a respectable 53% victory rate across all matches contested on tour.
Current Event H2H Stats: While past performances offer valuable insights when predicting tennis matches, current event statistics also play a significant role in assessing the form of the players. For specific indicators of in-form players, one should refer to the enticing section below (click here) to examine their performance in the ongoing event. Moreover, certain players showcase superior skills at particular events, further influencing the outcome.
Analyzing Break Point Conversion: Recent form indicates that Rosenkranz has capitalized on 37.35% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Radulov has availed themselves of 39.87% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This stat becomes pertinent when considering live betting options, especially when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
For those intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, the following article provides an excellent point of departure. However, note that it is primarily intended for the statistically inclined.
Mats Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mae Malige
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
54%
(
57 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
83 of
129)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
129)
118
Total Points Won
117
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Arthur Reymond
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
16 of
19)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
39
Total Points Won
40
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
87 of
128)
10
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
0
81%
(
57 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
62 of
87)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
31 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
45 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
62%
(
73 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
17
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
1
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
66 of
76)
66%
(
29 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
27 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
24 of
116)
114
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 6-7(1) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nicolas Parizzia
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
4
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
65)
61
Total Points Won
59
|
6-7(2) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
11
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
42 of
51)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
13
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Matteo Fondriest
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
8
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
96%
(
27 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Iliyan Radulov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Nick Hardt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Iliyan Radulov
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 4-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Luis Garcia Paez
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
37
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Iliyan Radulov
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
76%
(
13 of
17)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
31
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Iliyan Radulov
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
46 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Fernandez Flores
Player
Iliyan Radulov
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
2
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Iliyan Radulov
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (296/280) | Win/Loss | 62% (78/48) |
| 50% (670/662) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (172/112) |
| 51% (6575/6416) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1416/1184) |
| 44% (54/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (17/18) |
| 49% (107/110) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (58/29) |
| 57% (126/95) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 60% (9/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.59 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 3722 | Aces Total | 156 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1847 | Total Double Faults | 216 |
| 1:23:52 | Average Match Time | 1:29:44 |
| 453.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 372.04 |
| 60% (20320/33771) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4473/7077) |
| 74% (15134/20320) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2859/4473) |
| 48% (6441/13451) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1329/2604) |
| 38% (1101/2877) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (372/862) |
| 37% (12627/34355) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3166/7306) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (67/79) | Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) |
| 54% (228/196) | Futures W/L | 63% (72/42) |
| 51% (289/566) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (78/126) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (110/217) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (10/26) |
| 55% (103/187) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 84% (288/242) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (81/73) |
| 16% (288/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (81/8) |
| 18% (287/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (45/5) |
See recent tennis photos of Rosenkranz and Radulov
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mats Rosenkranz
View full predicted draw for Rosenkranz in Dizier
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
