Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mats Hermans vs Calin Manda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hermans vs Manda analysis and find out who is favored!
Mats Hermans vs Calin Manda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hermans has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Manda has won 54.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hermans, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Manda has won 49.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hermans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Manda has saved 57.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hermans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Manda winning 53.85% (W/L 28/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hermans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 80/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Manda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 195/ 157), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Hermans has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Manda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 28/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hermans winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Hermans winning 2 and Manda winning 3. The last match between Hermans and Manda was at the M15 Antalya, 18-02-2020, Q3, Clay with Calin Manda getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hermans and Manda have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hermans winning 1 times and Manda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hermans winning 1, and Manda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hermans has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Manda has played against players with an average rank of 224.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hermans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Manda has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hermans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Manda has converted 51.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hermans 1 - 1 Manda
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
798
Rank
607
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
49% (90-95)
Career Total W/L
54% (216-182)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
29% (2-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mats Hermans | Calin Manda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 24 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| 6-4 3-6 7-6(1) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mats Hermans | Calin Manda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (5/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (66/91) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 120.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (310/471) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (182/310) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (78/161) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (17/38) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (170/474) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Mats Hermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Niccolo Catini
Player
Mats Hermans
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tao Mu
Player
Mats Hermans
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
66%
(
31 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
34%
(
33 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Hermans
Player
Asaf Friedler
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
40 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
74
|
0-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 3-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Mats Hermans
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
27 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Hermans
Player
Aaron James Williams
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Calin Manda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Calin Manda
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michel Hopp
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Calin Manda
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Sarp Agabigun
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Boros
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Giotis
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Corentin Denolly
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michael Agwi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hermans Vs Manda Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
