Matisse Farzam vs Ryan Dickerson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Farzam vs R. Dickerson

Matisse Farzam
USA
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
18
Age
28
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
726
0
Best Rank
718
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Ryan Dickerson
USA
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
18
Age
28
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
726
0
Best Rank
718
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Farzam 1 - 0 Dickerson
They have played 3 sets in total, with Matisse Farzam winning 2 and Ryan Dickerson winning 1. The last match between Matisse Farzam and Ryan Dickerson was at the M15 Orange Park, 01-05-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Matisse Farzam getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Farzam | 1 |
| Dickerson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Orange Park(05-01-24)
Matisse Farzam
3
7
6
Ryan Dickerson
6
5
0
M. Farzam vs R. Dickerson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 46.15% (6-7) | Career Total W/L | 59.16% (113-78) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Farzam vs R. Dickerson Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matisse Farzam has won 40.87% of points on their second serve, while Ryan Dickerson has won 41.00%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matisse Farzam, in recent form, has won 37.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ryan Dickerson has won 51.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.72% and 26.70% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matisse Farzam has saved 60.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ryan Dickerson has saved 53.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matisse Farzam has won 60.00% of matches played (W/L 3/2), with Ryan Dickerson winning 62.50% (W/L 40/24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matisse Farzam has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 5/3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Ryan Dickerson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 50/32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Matisse Farzam has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.00% of matches (W/L 3/2), where as Ryan Dickerson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.91% of matches (W/L 37/20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matisse Farzam winning 1 times and Ryan Dickerson being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Matisse Farzam winning 2 and Ryan Dickerson winning 1.
- The last match between Matisse Farzam and Ryan Dickerson was at the M15 Orange Park, 01-05-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Matisse Farzam getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:11:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matisse Farzam has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.2 while Ryan Dickerson has played against players with an average rank of 401.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matisse Farzam has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ryan Dickerson has won 32% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matisse Farzam has converted 38.10% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ryan Dickerson has converted 41.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Matisse Farzam vs Ryan Dickerson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Farzam vs R. Dickerson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 3:11:0 | Average Match Time | 3:11:0 |
| 59% (44/74) | 1st Serve % | 53% (58/109) |
| 66% (29/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (38/58) |
| 63% (19/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (22/51) |
| 29% (5/17) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
| 45% (49/109) | Return Points Win % | 35% (26/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Farzam 58%, Dickerson 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Farzam 59%, Dickerson 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Farzam 68%, Dickerson 60%.
M. Farzam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R. Dickerson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
F | L | 7-6(4) 6-2 | ||

M. Farzam vs R. Dickerson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.15% (6/7) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.16% (113/78) |
| 45.16% (14/17) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.46% (264/180) |
| 48.68% (148/156) | Games Win/Loss | 54.44% (2250/1883) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.43% (63/43) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.98% (50/32) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 17 | Aces Total | 184 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 540 |
| 1:13:50 | Average Match Time | 1:9:50 |
| 296.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 355.29 |
| 62% (365/586) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4603/7264) |
| 60% (220/365) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3056/4603) |
| 52% (116/221) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1166/2661) |
| 39% (22/57) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (347/729) |
| 39% (231/587) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2960/7164) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Futures W/L | 59.78% (110/74) |
| 46% (6/13) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (113/191) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (21/41) |
| 60% (3/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (24/62) |
| 67% (6/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (128/102) |
| 33% (6/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (128/26) |
| 29% (7/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (63/11) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 29 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 07:00 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 05:05 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 11:00 AM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 05:05 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Alafia Ayeni Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

27 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Rio Noguchi Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
18:30
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
21:30
H2H 0-0
06:30
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Ribeirao Preto
Brazil
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic