R. A. Stoiber
To Win
S. Iliev
To Win
Matilde Paoletti vs Ranah Akua Stoiber Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W W L
Form
L W L L W L W W L WHead-to-head: Paoletti 1 - 0 Stoiber
They have played 3 sets in total, with Paoletti winning 2 and Stoiber winning 1. The last match between Paoletti and Stoiber was at the W35 Manchester, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Matilde Paoletti getting the victory 7-6(4) 1-6 10-7.
W35 Manchester(17-02-2025)
7
6
1
6
10
7
Upcoming Match
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rakhimova VS Blinkova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Pera VS Montgomery PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 1-6 10-7 |
Stats 
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
18
Games Won
19
0
Aces (Total)
4
4
Total Double Faults
1
1:56:38
Average Match Time
1:56:38
70% (64/91)
1st Serve %
63% (36/57)
61% (39/64)
1st Serve Win %
72% (26/36)
37% (10/27)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (11/21)
100% (1/1)
Break Points Won % (Total)
29% (4/14)
35% (20/57)
Return Points Win %
46% (42/91)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matilde Paoletti vs Ranah Akua Stoiber Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Matilde Paoletti 1 - 0 Ranah Akua Stoiber
Predictive Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match
- Second Serve Performance Analysis: In their recent six-month form, Paoletti has exhibited a second serve success rate of 44.77%, while Stoiber boasts a higher rate of 51.23%. The significance of this statistic correlates strongly with the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics Evaluation: Recent return game data indicates that Paoletti has won an impressive 58.04% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Stoiber's performance stands at 53.92%. For first serve returns, Paoletti achieves a rate of 43.55%, whereas Stoiber trails slightly behind with 35.57%. These figures possess a considerable influence on determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When faced with pressure situations, Paoletti has demonstrated the ability to save 51.21% of breakpoints in their recent form. On the other hand, Stoiber has showcased an even higher rate of 57.64%. Such statistics prove invaluable for precision in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Over the preceding year, Paoletti has emerged victorious in an impressive 63.64% of their matches, with a win-loss record of 21/12. Stoiber, while not matching Paoletti's success, maintains a solid 50% win rate, with a record of 15/15. These figures contribute significantly to the overall head-to-head prediction overview.
- Preferred Surface: Analyzing the players' career win percentages on different surfaces reveals that Paoletti excels on indoor hard courts, securing an impressive 60% win rate (6/4), whereas their performance on grass courts is less favorable, amounting to 0% wins (0/1). In contrast, Stoiber performs best on clay courts, boasting a win rate of 67% (2/1), but struggles on grass courts, securing victories in only 47% of matches (7/8).
- Player Level: In the past year, Paoletti has primarily competed in challengers and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000, tallying an impressive 63.64% win rate (21/12). Meanwhile, Stoiber's focus also lies in challengers and ITF tournaments with the same prize money range, achieving a slightly lower win rate of 54.17% (13/11). It is crucial to consider the relative event level of each player when comparing their statistics to predict the favorite.
- Opponent Quality Analysis: Over the course of the last 12 months, Paoletti has faced opponents with an average ranking of 358.64, while Stoiber's opponents maintain an average ranking of 326.13. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered, influencing their overall performance.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is noteworthy that Paoletti has emerged victorious in 65% of deciding sets over the past year, whereas Stoiber has secured wins in only 33% of matches played on tour. This insight holds particular significance if the current match extends to a decisive set.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: Though examining past player performance proves valuable in predicting tennis matches, assessing current event stats for indications of in-form players becomes equally crucial once the event is underway. For the most accurate outcome prediction, it is advisable to refer to the section below that discusses player performance in the current event. Furthermore, certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, and this aspect should be duly considered when making predictions.
- Break Point Conversion Analysis: Recent data reveals that Paoletti successfully converted 49.28% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Stoiber achieved a similar rate of 49.26% when seizing the opportunity to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves particularly informative for in-game live betting tips whenever either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by predictive models for tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point (Warning: Suitable for stats enthusiasts only).
Matilde Paoletti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Matilde Paoletti
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
82%
(
59 of
72)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Hiromi Abe
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 1-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Hephzibah Oluwadare
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Matilde Paoletti
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
51
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Matilde Paoletti
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Ariana Arseneault
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Ellie Schoppe
80%
(
97 of
122)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
10 of
41)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
61 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Matilde Paoletti
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
view more
Ranah Akua Stoiber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Zoe Hitt
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
69)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 1-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Urszula Radwanska
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Sofia Costoulas
41%
(
27 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
94)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (63/45)
Win/Loss
52% (50/46)
55% (142/115)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (121/101)
52% (1244/1160)
Games Win/Loss
52% (1056/988)
33% (1/2)
Hard Win/Loss
51% (21/20)
60% (52/35)
Clay Win/Loss
67% (2/1)
59% (10/7)
Indoor Hard W/L
54% (20/17)
0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss
47% (7/8)
0.07
Aces Per Game
0.33
79
Aces Total
325
0.37
Double Faults Per Game
0.17
433
Total Double Faults
174
1:42:30
Average Match Time
1:36:47
418.06
Average Opponent Rank
360.21
67% (5015/7436)
1st Serve %
56% (3550/6305)
59% (2948/5015)
1st Serve Win %
67% (2371/3550)
43% (1049/2421)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (1296/2755)
48% (496/1035)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (308/706)
47% (3568/7515)
Return Points Win %
43% (2634/6171)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (3/3)
Main Tour W/L
33% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
61% (51/33)
Challenger W/L
51% (36/34)
53% (9/8)
Futures W/L
59% (13/9)
59% (62/105)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
53% (50/94)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
61% (14/23)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (12/22)
64% (28/44)
Deciding Set Win %
38% (12/32)
83% (64/53)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (50/43)
17% (64/11)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (50/7)
25% (44/11)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (46/8)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
