Matilde Paoletti vs Hiromi Abe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W W L
Form
W L W W L W L W W LHead-to-head: Paoletti 1 - 0 Abe
They have played 3 sets in total, with Paoletti winning 2 and Abe winning 1. The last match between Paoletti and Abe was at the W35 Manchester, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Matilde Paoletti getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-4.
W35 Manchester(18-02-2025)
3
6
7
5
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Hiromi Abe
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
16
Games Won
15
1
Aces (Total)
2
3
Total Double Faults
2
2:26:29
Average Match Time
2:26:29
76% (67/88)
1st Serve %
69% (68/98)
57% (38/67)
1st Serve Win %
60% (41/68)
52% (11/21)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (13/30)
28% (5/18)
Break Points Won % (Total)
71% (5/7)
45% (44/98)
Return Points Win %
44% (39/88)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matilde Paoletti vs Hiromi Abe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Matilde Paoletti 1 - 0 Hiromi Abe
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Paoletti has achieved a second serve success rate of 44.43%, whereas Abe has accomplished 48.94% in this aspect. This statistic highly correlates with the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics in Recent Form: Analyzing return game stats in recent form reveals that Paoletti has excelled in winning 57.72% of their opponents' second serve points. Comparatively, Abe has shown slightly better performance by winning 61.07% in similar situations. The corresponding percentages for first serve returns stand at 43.07% for Paoletti and 45.25% for Abe. These numbers significantly influence the determination of the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When facing pressure situations, Paoletti has successfully saved 52.49% of breakpoints in recent form. Similarly, Abe has saved 52% of these crucial points. This particular statistic holds valuable importance for making predictions during in-game betting.
- Performance Overview: Examining the players' performance over the past year, Paoletti has achieved a 64.71% win rate with a record of 22 wins and 12 losses. Abe, on the other hand, has emerged victorious in 72.86% of matches, boasting a record of 51 wins and 19 losses. These figures provide an overall prediction for their head-to-head matchup.
- Preferred Surfaces: Paoletti's highest career surface win percentage is on hard court (I.hard), where they have won 64% of their matches (7 wins, 4 losses). In contrast, their performance on grass courts is considerably lower, having won 0% of matches (0 wins, 1 loss). Abe, however, thrives on hard court surfaces, boasting a remarkable 71% win rate (75 wins, 31 losses), while experiencing a less successful streak on I.hard with a 64% win rate (7 wins, 4 losses).
- Player Level: Within the past year, Paoletti has primarily participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K. In this category, they have achieved a 64.71% win rate (22 wins, 12 losses). Conversely, Abe has predominantly competed in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with prize money totaling $10K. Within this context, they have demonstrated an impressive 75.56% win rate (34 wins, 11 losses). When comparing player stats to predict the favored player, it is essential to consider the relative event level at which they have competed.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Paoletti has faced opponents with an average ranking of 365.38, whereas Abe has encountered players with an average ranking of 428.47.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting, it is interesting to note that Paoletti has emerged victorious in 67% of deciding sets over the past year. Abe, however, has achieved an even higher success rate of 72% in all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head (H2H) Stats: While past player performance serves as a useful indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to evaluate current event statistics to assess an in-form player's prospects. The section below delves into these current event stats (provided they have played a match in the ongoing tournament). Additionally, certain players exhibit enhanced performances at specific events, taking such factors into consideration when determining the outcome is vital.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Paoletti has impressively converted 49.46% of their breakpoints, while Abe has showcased their ability by converting 50.78% of chances to break their opponents' serve. These significant statistics offer valuable insights for in-game live betting, particularly when a player has the opportunity to seize a breakpoint.
- If you possess an interest in models that effectively predict tennis matches, reading this article is highly recommended. Please note that it caters to statistics enthusiasts exclusively.
Matilde Paoletti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Matilde Paoletti
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
82%
(
59 of
72)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Hiromi Abe
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 1-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Hephzibah Oluwadare
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Matilde Paoletti
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
51
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Matilde Paoletti
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Ariana Arseneault
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Ellie Schoppe
80%
(
97 of
122)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
10 of
41)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
61 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Matilde Paoletti
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
view more
Hiromi Abe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Hiromi Abe
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Gaia Maduzzi
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Katharina Hobgarski
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Hiromi Abe
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Beatrice Ricci
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Hiromi Abe
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Alice Gillan
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
54
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 1-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Esther Adeshina
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Hiromi Abe
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Federica Urgesi
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (63/45)
Win/Loss
68% (102/49)
55% (142/115)
Sets Win/Loss
63% (217/125)
52% (1244/1160)
Games Win/Loss
57% (1697/1302)
33% (1/2)
Hard Win/Loss
71% (75/31)
60% (52/35)
Clay Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
59% (10/7)
Indoor Hard W/L
60% (27/18)
0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.07
Aces Per Game
0.07
79
Aces Total
107
0.37
Double Faults Per Game
0.26
433
Total Double Faults
375
1:42:30
Average Match Time
1:30:10
418.08
Average Opponent Rank
439.08
67% (5015/7436)
1st Serve %
67% (5816/8707)
59% (2948/5015)
1st Serve Win %
61% (3568/5816)
43% (1049/2421)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (1363/2893)
48% (496/1035)
Break Points Won % (Total)
52% (664/1274)
47% (3568/7515)
Return Points Win %
49% (4436/9062)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (3/3)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
61% (51/33)
Challenger W/L
61% (46/29)
53% (9/8)
Futures W/L
74% (56/20)
59% (62/105)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
67% (99/148)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
61% (14/23)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
44% (8/18)
64% (28/44)
Deciding Set Win %
63% (26/41)
83% (64/53)
1st Set Won, Won Match
91% (95/86)
17% (64/11)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
9% (95/9)
25% (44/11)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
29% (56/16)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
