Matilde Mariani vs Daniela Glanzer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mariani vs Glanzer analysis and find out who is favored!
Matilde Mariani vs Daniela Glanzer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mariani has won 39.71% of points on his second serve, while Glanzer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mariani, in recent form, has won 61.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Glanzer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.21% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mariani has saved 58.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Glanzer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mariani has won 48.48% of matches played (W/L 16/ 17), with Glanzer winning 44.44% (W/L 4/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mariani has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 38/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Glanzer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Mariani has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 9/ 12), where as Glanzer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mariani winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mariani winning 2 and Glanzer winning 1. The last match between Mariani and Glanzer was at the W25 Tarvisio, 26-06-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Matilde Mariani getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mariani and Glanzer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mariani winning 1 times and Glanzer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mariani winning 1, and Glanzer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mariani has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.18 while Glanzer has played against players with an average rank of 128.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mariani has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Glanzer has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mariani has converted 58.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Glanzer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mariani 1 - 0 Glanzer
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
50% (52-52)
Career Total W/L
44% (27-34)
56% (5-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matilde Mariani | Daniela Glanzer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 19 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 7-6(5) 10-6 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matilde Mariani | Daniela Glanzer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (95/89) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
Aces Total | 6 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.43 | 0 |
DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:7:40 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 127.78 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (238/392) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (148/238) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 39% (60/154) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (22/42) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 47% (193/410) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Matilde Mariani Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Franziska Sziedat
Player
Matilde Mariani
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve %
47%
(
14 of
30)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
37
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matilde Mariani
Player
Julia Middendorf
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matilde Mariani
Player
Ranim Rassil
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
57
Total Points Won
53
|
0-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Matilde Mariani
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matilde Mariani
Player
Sameeksha Shroff
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Arina Bulatova
Player
Matilde Mariani
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matilde Mariani
Player
Luana Plaza Araujo
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-3 13-11 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Daniela Glanzer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Adrienn Nagy
Player
Daniela Glanzer
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Daniela Glanzer
Player
Alina Michalitsch
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Daniela Glanzer
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniela Glanzer
Player
Barbora Zaviskova
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more