Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matija Pecotic vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pecotic vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Matija Pecotic vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pecotic has won 52.35% of points on his second serve, while Carabelli has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pecotic, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.22% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pecotic has saved 54.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pecotic has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 20/ 12), with Carabelli winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pecotic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 155/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Pecotic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 12/ 7), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pecotic has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.69 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pecotic has won 13% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pecotic has converted 47.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pecotic 0 - 0 Carabelli
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matija Pecotic | Camilo UGO Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (18/12) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (153/117) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 30 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 150.92 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (477/838) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (333/477) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (189/361) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (50/105) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (393/881) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (5/5) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (7/13) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 1st Match |
Matija Pecotic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Matija Pecotic
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Matija Pecotic
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Preston Brown
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Matija Pecotic
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Aydan Gomez Osorio
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Evan Bynoe
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Joshua Sheehy
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo UGO Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luis Britto
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Pecotic Vs Carabelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
