Matic Spec vs Jumpei Yamasaki Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Spec vs Yamasaki analysis and find out who is favored!
Matic Spec vs Jumpei Yamasaki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Spec has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Yamasaki has won 51.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Spec, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Yamasaki has won 54.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Spec has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yamasaki has saved 55.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Spec has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Yamasaki winning 55.81% (W/L 24/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59). Yamasaki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 188/ 135), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 9/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Spec winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Spec winning 2 and Yamasaki winning 0. The last match between Spec and Yamasaki was at the M25 Palm Coast, 23-01-2019, First, Clay with Matic Spec getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Spec and Yamasaki have played a deciding set 0 times, with Spec winning 0 times and Yamasaki 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Spec winning 1, and Yamasaki 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Spec has played against opponents with an average rank of while Yamasaki has played against players with an average rank of 88.7.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Spec has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yamasaki has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Spec has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yamasaki has converted 49.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Spec 1 - 0 Yamasaki
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
446
High
26
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
64% (167-95)
Career Total W/L
57% (232-172)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matic Spec | Jumpei Yamasaki |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:0 | 1:53:0 |
1st Serve % | 51% (40/78) | 68% (47/69) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (28/40) | 66% (31/47) |
2nd Serve Win% | 58% (22/38) | 32% (7/22) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 45% (31/69) | 36% (28/78) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(2) |
Matic Spec
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matic Spec | Jumpei Yamasaki |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (18/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (178/145) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.22 |
Aces Total | 0 | 35 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.05 |
DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 41.14 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (333/495) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (225/333) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (80/162) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (20/45) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (197/491) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 89% (9/8) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Jumpei Yamasaki Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
9
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jumpei Yamasaki
Player
Leo Vithoontien
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
7
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H |
view more