Matic Spec vs George Loffhagen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Spec vs Loffhagen analysis and find out who is favored!
Matic Spec vs George Loffhagen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Spec has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Loffhagen has won 58.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Spec, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loffhagen has won 48.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Spec has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loffhagen has saved 47.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Spec has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Loffhagen winning 69.05% (W/L 29/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59). Loffhagen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 32/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Spec winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Spec winning 0 and Loffhagen winning 2. The last match between Spec and Loffhagen was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 24-02-2021, First, Hard with George Loffhagen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Spec and Loffhagen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Spec winning 0 times and Loffhagen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Spec winning 0, and Loffhagen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Spec has played against opponents with an average rank of while Loffhagen has played against players with an average rank of 257.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Spec has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loffhagen has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Spec has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loffhagen has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Spec 0 - 1 Loffhagen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
380
Rank
333
High
22
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
64% (167-95)
Career Total W/L
61% (137-86)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matic Spec | George Loffhagen |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 4 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (27/48) | 59% (37/63) |
1st Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 78% (29/37) |
2nd Serve Win% | 43% (9/21) | 38% (10/26) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 56% (5/9) |
Return Points W% | 38% (24/63) | 54% (26/48) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-1 |
George Loffhagen
Player
Matic Spec
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matic Spec | George Loffhagen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (68/56) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.45 |
Aces Total | 0 | 27 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 0 | 12 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:49:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 60.83 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (240/379) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (176/240) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (81/139) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (16/37) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (167/418) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
George Loffhagen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
George Loffhagen
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Henrique Rocha
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
George Loffhagen
Player
Rigele Te
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
George Loffhagen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Henry Searle
Player
George Loffhagen
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
9 of
9)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
44%
(
12 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
25
|
3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
George Loffhagen
Player
Michael Shaw
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
George Loffhagen
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
George Loffhagen
Player
Johannes Seeman
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Oliver Tarvet
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
80 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
49 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
117
|
4-6 7-6(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
George Loffhagen
Player
Patrick Brady
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 7-6(13) | H2H |
view more