Matic Spec vs Christian Lindell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Spec vs Lindell analysis and find out who is favored!
Matic Spec vs Christian Lindell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Spec has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lindell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Spec, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lindell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Spec has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lindell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Spec has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lindell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59). Lindell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 415/ 271), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Spec winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Spec winning 1 and Lindell winning 2. The last match between Spec and Lindell was at the M25 Weston, 29-01-2019, Q3, Clay with Christian Lindell getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Spec and Lindell have played a deciding set 1 times, with Spec winning 0 times and Lindell 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Spec winning 0, and Lindell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Spec has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lindell has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Spec has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lindell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Spec has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lindell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Spec 0 - 1 Lindell
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
177
High
32
Age
R
Plays
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
Form
64% (167-95)
Career Total W/L
59% (442-303)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$68,305
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matic Spec | Christian Lindell |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 13 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (35/59) | 66% (48/73) |
1st Serve Win% | 57% (20/35) | 65% (31/48) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (13/24) | 48% (12/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 75% (3/4) |
Return Points W% | 41% (30/73) | 44% (26/59) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 3-6 10-3 |
Christian Lindell
Player
Matic Spec
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matic Spec | Christian Lindell |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Christian Lindell Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Christian Lindell
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mathys Erhard
Player
Christian Lindell
78%
(
73 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christian Lindell
Player
Patrik Rikl
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrew Paulson
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Christian Lindell
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Christian Lindell
41%
(
46 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
52%
(
34 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Christian Lindell
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Christian Lindell
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more