Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila vs Cengiz AKSU Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gomila vs AKSU analysis and find out who is favored!
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila vs Cengiz AKSU Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gomila has won 0% of points on his second serve, while AKSU has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gomila, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while AKSU has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gomila has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas AKSU has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gomila has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with AKSU winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gomila has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). AKSU has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gomila has played against opponents with an average rank of while AKSU has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gomila has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while AKSU has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gomila has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and AKSU has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gomila 0 - 0 AKSU
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila | Cengiz AKSU |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Louroi Martinez
Player
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alen Moritz Hodzic
Player
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jeroen Vanneste
Player
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Cayetano March
Player
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
48
Total Points Won
48
|
1-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H |
view more
Cengiz AKSU Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Cengiz Aksu
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Cengiz Aksu
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Cengiz Aksu
80%
(
74 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Peter Heller
Player
Cengiz Aksu
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Attila Boros
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Denys Klok
Player
Cengiz Aksu
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
44
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Dong Ju Kim
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stefan Popovic
Player
Cengiz Aksu
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Sergei Pogosian
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
111)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
120
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(11) 6-2 | H2H |
view more