M. Erhard
To Win
C. Negritu
To Win
Mathys Erhard vs James McCabe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W L W LH2H: Erhard 1 - 0 McCabe
They have played 2 sets in total, with Erhard winning 2 and McCabe winning 0. The last match between Erhard and McCabe was at the French Open - Paris, 19-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Mathys Erhard getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mathys Erhard | 1 |
| James McCabe | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(19-05-2025)
Mathys Erhard
James McCabe
6
1
6
1
| Erhard | Stats | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (15-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (17-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 272 | Ranking | 183 |
| 265 | Highest Rank | 176 |
| 23 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (243-155) | Career Total W/L | 58% (157-113) |
| $43,000 | Career Prize Money | $234,855 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Diallo VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draxl VS Lajovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Mathys Erhard
Player
James McCabe
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:20:0 | Average Match Time | 1:20:0 |
| 73% (37/51) | 1st Serve % | 42% (22/52) |
| 70% (26/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (14/22) |
| 64% (9/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (9/30) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 56% (29/52) | Return Points Win % | 31% (16/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Erhard vs McCabe Match Preview :
- Second serve superiority: In the last six months, Erhard slightly outperformed, winning 44.89% of second serve points compared to Mc Cabe's 44.04%. Can this marginal edge be crucial? It might be, considering how closely matched they are in this area.
- Return game insights: Mc Cabe edges ahead on second serve returns, securing 47.4% of points, whereas Erhard achieves 46.45%. However, Erhard demonstrates stronger first serve return stats with 30.45%, compared to Mc Cabe's 23.06%. Does Erhard's ability to counter first serves give them an upper hand?
- Pressure resilience: When under pressure, Mc Cabe saves 58.7% of breakpoints, outperforming Erhard's 54.89%. This could provide Mc Cabe with a slight mental edge in critical game situations.
- Overall performance trend: In the past year, Erhard boasts a significant advantage, winning 68.29% of matches (56/26), while Mc Cabe has not claimed a single victory. Does this stark difference indicate Erhard's superior form?
- Opponent caliber: Erhard's experience against higher-ranked opponents, with an average ranking of 354.73, suggests better preparation for competitive play. How might this experience guide Erhard in the match against Mc Cabe?
- Deciding set effectiveness: Erhard excels in deciding sets, winning 54% over the past year, while Mc Cabe has not won any. This statistic is crucial if the match extends to a final set.
- Breakpoint conversion: Erhard converts 37.65% of breakpoints versus Mc Cabe's 33.53%, potentially making a difference in moments requiring decisive plays.
Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performances and statistics, Erhard demonstrates a consistent advantage in multiple key areas. With a higher conversion rate of break points and proven ability to handle pressure in deciding sets, Erhard exhibits signs of a more formidable competitor.
Conversely, Mc Cabe has shown resilience in saving breakpoints, but the lack of match wins over the past year could indicate a struggle to secure victories against challenging opponents.
Considering the strengths and current form of both players, Erhard appears to be better positioned to claim victory in this upcoming encounter. It is likely that Erhard will emerge as the winner of the match.
Erhard vs McCabe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mathys Erhard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Mathys Erhard
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Mathys Erhard
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Lucas Bouquet
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Mathys Erhard
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
82%
(
45 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Mathys Erhard
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
James McCabe
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Mathys Erhard
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
83%
(
63 of
76)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
James McCabe
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
George Loffhagen
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
12
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
29 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Chris Rodesch
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Harold Mayot
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thijs Boogaard
Player
James McCabe
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
3
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
James McCabe
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
James McCabe
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
James McCabe
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (243/155) | Win/Loss | 58% (157/113) |
| 59% (544/375) | Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (4697/3974) | Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (31/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (132/80) |
| 65% (205/112) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (12/18) |
| 33% (7/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 828 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 944 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:30:46 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 423.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 65% (14860/22734) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (9866/14860) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (3884/7873) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (1223/2691) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (10067/23283) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 49% (46/48) | Challenger W/L | 53% (76/67) |
| 65% (196/104) | Futures W/L | 71% (73/30) |
| 61% (239/391) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (54/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (65/124) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 88% (234/205) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 12% (234/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 23% (164/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Erhard vs. McCabe Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
